Excellent!
One of the most puzzeling things (I think) about the Watchtower organzation is the level at which members have no real idea what the experiences of others really are. They don't know anything about leaders, policies, procedures or members for which they have no contact with. I don't think this is all intential. Because the Watchtower is print oriented with very little deviation from a routinized article structure, there is so much information the individual JW just doesn't know.
Typcially in other organizations these gaps would be filled by things such as newletters, websites, books written by members, ect. But in the Watchtower there is no ablitiy for members to participate in such things. This leads to a general ignorance the members end up having about their own organization.
Eventually, somebody like you comes along and then those who are out of the organization tend to find out more than they ever did.
What I find most puzzling about this is that while it may give off the appearance of something beneficial to Watchtower leaders (namely, more control over information/members), there are a good number of reasons why this is also "bad for business". The main reason being that people would possibly be more involved and excited about the movement if they had more contact with it in dynamic ways. It's almost like most of the "rank and file" are outside members of an organization, or to put it another way, there are really two types of Watchtower membership. One where you are on the "inside" (mainly people who are in the physical facilities and/or regional programs), and those that attend the services (rand and file). The first group gets much more access and even acts differently than the other group in many instances (probably because the first gropu are locked away from reality!)