Is health care really better in Canada?

by Bubblie 43 Replies latest jw friends

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24
    the reading physicians say MRI's are way overused.

    That was one of the finding in the waste of money in healthcare costs in the USA. People with insurance they reported, will generally be sent for scans regardless of the actual need - but because it is covered. This pushes up the costs for everyone and the report alleged the same with heart operations. Apparently the USA has the highest number of heart surgeries but reports stated that in at least a third of those, the problem should have and could have been addressed by lifestyle changes and/or medication. There is more money to be had in surgery therefore, more surgeries are scheduled. I think it was maybe the AMA that did the report a while back - sammieswife.

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24
    Further to your comment, Sammieswife, these new drugs can be extremely costly, to the point of bankruptcy or death for some people. Canadian health-care is nowhere near perfect. Nothing is. We have long waits for MRI's, knee replacements, cataract surgery, etc. etc. etc.

    Agreed nothing is perfect..but in speaking of emergencies and necessities - at least you can get that knee replacement and cataract surgery - my dad, a Canadian, waited 3 weeks for his cataract surgery and my mother had waited 2 months until an infection issue was cleared up. I don't consider those wait times extraordinarily long. On the flip side, my father was taken immediately by me to the hospital for a heart attack and admitted immediately, kept in intensive care for a week - without a question or a wait. My aunt was transferred immediately from one hospital to a major hospital specializing in cardiology 200 miles away to get emergency heart surgery - no wait, no question, no problem. Those are emergencies - all such things should be covered.

    I myself waited for a neurologist appointment in a major facility for 2 months (in Canada) - did I complain???? Not at all. I had been seeing a neurologist for 5 years and wanted a second opinion for a possible brain operation - I opted for a facility that dealt with the specialities. My condition wasn't life threatening or I would have been rushed ahead of everyone else. I could wait - it wasn't an issue. If it had been 6 months down the road it wouldn't have been an issue. I cannot even get health insurance in the USA that will let me get a check up or care without it costing me thousands upon thousands of dollars a year - which I don't have. So all the machinery in the world as I said means nothing if you don't have the resources to be allowed to use it.

    Again it's what you believe in. I am a firm believer that necessary medical and emergency care should be available for all equally. So the opinion of what better health care is, depends on your value and belief system. sammieswife.

  • Lady Lee
    Lady Lee

    purplesofa

    Every one of mu MRIs came back negative. That can be good or it can be bad. In my case negative MRI's simply mean we rule out one more possible diagnosis. After my first MRI came back as a negative I was shattered. I thought for sure we would find the cause of my pain. In that case I would have almost preferred the positive result because a surgery would possibly fixed the problem and I could go on with my life.

    In emergency medicine I would think a negative MRI would in many cases be a blessing by ruling out some serious problems

  • purplesofa
    purplesofa

    I can't remember the MRI scan, but there is only one true MRI that is used for emergency, CAT scans are done for emergencies(when admitted to emergency room)

    And you are right, many MRI's are done to rule out a diagnosis or rule out mets. I was referring to overuse or misuse of MRI's.

    purps

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit