Interesting to me, the way you think about this Frenchy. That is, if I have it right.
It seems to me that when most people question "what is the purpose of life?" they are asking from a human standpoint. You seem to only even be asking from a creator's standpoint, ie. "what is God's purpose for us?" It isn't that I don't find it a valid question, but I don't agree that w/o a creator there can be no purpose. That is just narrowing the word "purpose" down a bit to much for reason, imo.
I'll admit to having struggled when a friend, in dire emotional pain, fairly begged me to help him understand the "meaning of life". In the end though, it didnt' matter, 'cause what he neaded was medication and therapy, not platitudes. I've been there, I know.
You ask: "What can be the purpose of life if life was not purposefully created?" I guess "just about whatever the hell we want it to be" would be an easy answer. But maybe we all should take such a narrow construct for the word "purpose". In which case, it is a silly question for athiest and agnostics, and really only valuable for believers to the extent that they have some inside knowledge of "Gods" purpose.
I just don't see any of the "holy writings" having a credible shot at revealing Gods purpose. Now nature, it speaks pretty loudly and consistantly, so if one believes in God, that is where they should focus their energies in getting to know God, IMO. After all, even atheist won't argue the lessons learned from nature.
We have life, but we don't create life, so it isn't up to us to give it purpose in the sense of creating something for a purpose. Yet some would argue effectively that we create our lives if not our life, and therefore we give it purpose, but again, you gotta widen the scope of the word "purpose" to do that. I think most people do include our own self-direction when they speak of "the purpose of life".
It’s like a clock with no hands or a radio without a speaker. It just functions, that’s all.
Now that's not a very charitable view of Abbadon!
If the purpose of life is life, then it has no purpose once life is achieved.
C'mon, the point was not
life, but
living, at least from a philosophical bent. Now at the end of that life..., yeah, big questions. But that is another topic altogether.