by hawkaw 39 Replies latest watchtower scandals
Hello Hawkaw,
thanks for this piece...!
It's a beauty, and will prove even more
how far the WTBS is from the " truth"
in their stetements, declarations, and
writing when they try to explain the reasons
for their affiliation, as NGO - with the
United Nations. Precious documents for the file!
Thanks again for your time and efforts,
greetings J.C.MacHislopp
to HAWK
thank u, too.
Please hawk mail me at [email protected]
I lost your email!! And I need to talk privately
I don't know if I can Email you or not. They switched my server at work to prevent all yahoo.com and hotmail Email accounts from reaching me on Dec. 11/01.
I am going to give you a try right now at 8:43:am.
If you don't get it - let me know and I will get you to snap an Email to someone else who WILL get it to me.
Hold on big guy.
hawk
I know most of you understand this and have recognized it. But for the rest of us .....
Please go back to my original post on this thread.
Now please notice the picture of the UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan (Bottom right corner of page 5 in the November 22, 1998 Awake! magazine, article title "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights")
Do you see what it says:
"UN/DPI photo by Evan Schneider (Feb97)
They would have needed permission from DPI (Department of Public Information at the United Nations) to print this photo. Seems they had given you guys hints of their "association" all along in the "fine print".
hawk
Main page:
< http://www.kenraggio.com/KRPN-TOC.htm
Hyperlinks from Main page:
< http://www.kenraggio.com/KRPN-SocialismRed.htm
< http://www.kenraggio.com/KRPN-KofiAnnan.htm
From this search:
< http://google.yahoo.com/bin/query?p=Kofi+Annan+Freemasonry&hc=0&hs=0
For more search "hits", insert other keywords.
sKally, happy trails
wcrestnpeace
Oh Happy Day.
I have not heard from you?
Did you get my Email and could you Email me back?
Let me know via this thread and if there is a problem I will Email you another way.
hawk
Flag for all who have not seen this thread yet and for Oh Happy Day who has not got a hold of me.
hawk
Hello Hawk and all!
Just wanted to bring this to the fore again, and add a few comments.
I went over this article word for word and it appears that the UN/DPI made no changes. We should all appreciate what Hawk has done here and many have expressed gratitude. What Hawk obtained effectively dispells the myth that what was presented to the UN for their approval prior to the printing of the November 22nd Awake! was propaganda for the WT.
Please note that ONLY the first article on pages 3-5 of that Awake! were submitted to the UN, entitled A"LONG JOB FINISHED".
The following articles, "A View from the 29th Floor","Human Rights and Wrongs Today", and finally, "Human Rights for All A Worldwide Reality!, evidently were not submitted to the UN. These could rightly be considered as propaganda for the WT.
When this issue was released, I was service overseer in my congregation. It was my custom to rise early on Saturday morning to review the WT and Awake magazines in order to bring out the field service points therein. I was probably no different from any other over-worked elder or publisher who was swamped with WT supplied reading material. And I admit that the Watchtower was the magazine that I perused. But I do remember thinking that this particular Awake article (A Long Job Finished)was strange in that it was not your typical UN jeremiad. But the following articles pointing to Jehovah's kingdom allayed those feelings of unease.
Fast forward to 2001 and their duplicity is evident.
Now before some point to the three questions under the last subheading in the article handed to the UN, "High Expectations", as proof that they were turning to WT propaganda in THAT article, consider this.
Reread carefully the last paragraph on page four. Note the question, "Are the UN member states measuring up to this yardstick?
Is this criticism of the UN? No indeed. It is a criticism of its members. The UN has the same view.
Note what the October 22nd 1985 Awake! had to say on this.
In the article "The UN-God's Way to Peace?, former Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim was quoted as saying: "One should realize that the United Nations is, after all, the world in microcosm. Its weaknesses must consequently be ascribed primarily to the contradictions that characterize the world community itself." He adds: "I should point out that it (the UN)(parentheses theirs) is no more than a mirror of the world it serves. That world is a conglomerate of extremely varied, often intractable, passionate, and antagonistic nations."
Copyright 1998 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.
That is also the UN's current view of its activities. Anything that underlines those frustrations (of dealing with varied member states)is welcomed.
In my opinion, the WT did live up to its obligations as a UN associated NGO, all the while walking the highwire of not unduly upsetting the rank and file.
That is what makes these documents from Geneva so important!
Did I mention THANKS HAWK!!!!
We appreciate your selfless labor in our behalf!
Dino
Thanks Dino.
Is this criticism of the UN? No indeed. It is a criticism of its members. The UN has the same view.Excellent point - excellent I will have to remember that.
One point I would like to make is that the article is really only on pages 3 and 4. Page 5 is the UDHR issue. To me it is a separate piece from the "Long Job Finished" piece. And of course page 5 just promotes the UDHR published by the UN. Just my thoughts.
Oh!! I am still waiting for Alex to get back to me on a cover letter - This is the wrong time of the season for a lot of us government folks so you will have to be patient on getting that plus I guess I am the first to actually "call" them on their sources (LOL). Once I get the cover letter, I will drop the bomb shell.
Thanks again Dino and all the rest of your comments.
I hope you guys like the FCCC stuff too and can add some comments to that thread!
hawk
You bet Hawk.
Thank you for the clarification on that article.
I also wanted to mention that the link that skally provided to the ThinkCenter is excellent. Here it is again:
< http://www.thinkcentre.org/article.cfm?ArticleID=55
There has GOT to be a story in there somewhere!
Amnesty International has big-time UN blessing and a globalist agenda.
Did the UN set policy for the WT in the area of civilian service?
I am only going on memory, but I think we had "new light" on that in the 1996 WT "God and the State".
Anyhow, just thinking outloud and maybe I could get some thoughts from a few here on the board.
Thanks again,Hawk
Dino
