All this blame game going on and no one ever stops to ask well what about the parents who did allow their little sons
to stay with a 30 or 40 year old man. What does that tell you about them? Do you consider them fit parents?
Even without the celebrity status what parent allows their 10 year old to go stay with a grown man that is not in
any way shape or form related to the man.
And don't stop there. Why when the detectives busted thru his doors at neverland ranch and basically raped his home
from top to bottom did they not find any clear evidence of wrong doing? Why does neither of his ex-wives have anything
to say about him being a child molester or believing him to be. I think Lisa Marie woulda said something if she thought
he was a molester. She had nothing to lose or gain financially cause she has her Elvis fortune to bank on.
There are many things that don't add up on closer inspection of the so-called evidence. I'm not saying that
he was totally innocent but also as others have pointed out follow the $$ signs. I've not got much use for a parent
that will settle for a monetary settlement if they really believe their child was molested. First you get the creep behind
bars so no others can be hurt by them then you go for the monetary damages which you will get anyhow after the
conviction. You NEVER let someone who you feel is guilty get away and be allowed to do it again to another innocent
child.