Wikipedia > "Controversies regarding Jehovah's Witnesses" is looking a little healthier since the last time I looked at it, too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_regarding_Jehovah%27s_Witnesses
Supreme Court Blood Case - WTS LOSES
by skeeter1 168 Replies latest watchtower medical
-
-
Spike Tassel
Spike Tassel (Post 55): According to http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms starts PART I with the following: "Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law". If so, this 6-1 decision is NOT the final say.
-
-
Spike Tassel
Spike Tassel (Post 58) re shamus100 (Post 2643): Jehovah has his own ways of speaking out for himself in cases such as this. It is his supremacy, i.e. sovereignty, that is at stake on this one. Just you mark my words. The governments are like dust on the scale in his eyes, after all.
-
-
Spike Tassel
Spike Tassel (Post 59) re shamus100 (Post 2652): I'll stick to seeing how Jehovah defends those he has commissioned, whether as parents or as Witnesses for his name and Kingdom. Dan.2:44 will be fulfilled soon enough. That will be interesting to witness.
-
-
Spike Tassel
Spike Tassel (Post 60): Mat.4:7 states "… 'Again it is written, "You must not put Jehovah your God to the test." '
-
AllTimeJeff
Shamus
Obviously, Jehovah doesn't use Tidy Bowl. It would GREATLY shorten his time cleaning your toilet.
Sincerely
A former janitorial pioneer.
-