District Convention ruminations

by sir82 37 Replies latest jw friends

  • sir82
    sir82

    If y'all can stand one more DC thread, I thought I'd post some miscellaneous rumbling ramblings about this year's edition.

    To protect my privacy, I'd prefer not to disclose the location - PM me if interested.

    ***** Attendance, as in all other years I can remember, was much lower on Friday than the other days. In fact, the attendance was 22% lower on Friday than on Sunday. So, as usual, they hammered home the point about the importance of attending all 3 days....on Friday! Ahem...DUH!

    ***** Number of baptisms was up 25% over the prior year. Then again, there were probably 10 or so additional congregations assigned to this year's DC, so some of that difference is to be expected. There were numerous pre-teens getting baptized, and a bunch more teens, but there were also several adults, including one couple in their 60's.

    ***** One of the most surprising things, to me anyway, was the lack of a concrete item that was demonized. In previous conventions, it seems there was always something that was hammered home as being of the devil. Some years it was higher education, other years apostate web sites & "false stories", other years pornography, other years drunkenness....nothing really stood out this year. Higher education was mentioned in passing just once in all 3 days.

    ***** The drama was a masterpiece of emotional manipulation - but it was well-written for its purpose. The "worldly" characters were of course extremely broad caricatures of greedy sex-starved drunken louts, but the "good" JW (fleshly) brother was unusual - he was the "good son", yet he really came off as sanctimonious and holier-than-thou. I found it quite unusual to present someone on the "right side" as such an unflattering character.

    ***** This was mentioned at least twice, in 2 different talks. It seems to be a new "twist" on WTS false prophecies. Here is the general gist of what they were trying to say:

    "Some" Jehovah's Witnesses have entertained wrong ideas about dates in the past. This however is not a bad thing. Instead, it is a good thing. The coming and going of 1914 (when "some" expected to go to heaven), 1975, etc. did NOT prove that JWs were "wrong" - instead it proved that they were "expectant". It proves they were "watchful", as Jesus said they should be.

    This was some really convoluted "logic", but nothing compared to the next point:

    ***** In the talk "Know That The End Is Near", there were presented 4 "lines of evidence" that the Great Tribulation is coming "soon" (by far the most used word in the whole DC). The first 3 were the usual claptrap about wars, earthquakes (yes, they said "seismic activity is increasing"), love cooling off, etc., but the final point was just jaw-droppingly stupid:

    He said that the new understanding of "this generation" proves that the GT is close. This "generation" is NOT all anointed Christians since 33 CE, but instead all anointed Christians since 1914. When the GT comes, there will still be members of that "generation" on the earth.

    OK, try to follow this - cuz I sure couldn't. "Remember when we used to look excitedly at the January 15 Watchtower, to see how many had partaken of the emblems in the previous Memorial? We were always so expectant & excited to see the number going down. Well, guess what - with this new understanding, the number of partakers completely doesn't matter! There will still be some anointed on the earth when the GT comes! So we have to be ready now."

    Ummm...didn't we excitedly check the 1/15 WTs to see the "dwindling" partaker count, because we knew there would have to be some left at the GT? And if the number got to be very small, well, the GT had to be close, right? It had to come before the number dropped to 0, right? I.e., no change from from the current understanding - there would still be anointed ones on earth when the GT came.

    Well, now that the number of partakers is growing at a double-digit percentage increase year over year, how is it that the "number doesn't matter any more"? I still can't figure it out.

    ***** Out of the 6 prayers, 2 began this way (not an exact quote, but the general idea): "We thank you Jehovah, that you have given us our marvelous hope, and we are not as blinded a the rest of the world, wandering about in darkness and ignorance..."

    It was just so striking, how the language almost exactly paralleled Luke 18:10-14, you know, the one where the Pharisee prays "O God I thank you that I am not as the rest of men, extortioners, unrighteous, adulterers, or even as this tax collector..."

    That's enough, I guess. If anybody has any questions on anything, let me know.

  • Quirky1
  • tresdecu
    tresdecu

    Thank you Sir82 for your observations! Your description of the Drama was spot on: "masterpiece of emotional manipulation" There was a lot of whaling going on, it tugged on the hearts of a lot of parents whose 'kids' left the truth. Especially when they played the corny music after! I think it backfired though, the younger ones (17-22 or so) probably rolled their eyes, as I would have at that age.

  • civicsi00
    civicsi00

    Sir82, on what day did they talk about the false prophecies (1975, etc.)?

  • lurk3r
    lurk3r

    infuriating.

    Teachings. DECADES of a solid "truth" (1914) that inspired so many to follow without question, now wiped out with a single sentence. Once again, without question.

  • undercover
    undercover

    Sorry you had to endure that, sir. I didn't know you were still attending...

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts on what you experienced. I've heard similar from a couple of sources.

  • sir82
    sir82

    The false prophecies (of course they didn't use that term!) were discussed most in depth on Friday afternoon, in the part titled "Answers to Questions About the Last Days". The exact question read was, "Why have some Jehovah's Witnesses entertained wrong expectations about dates?"

    I imagine this will show up as a "Questions from Readers" in a future Watchtower.

    Similar points were made in the talk "Learn Watchfulness From Jesus' Apostles" on Saturday (as in, "even though the apostles entertained wrong ideas about when & how Jesus would return, it showed that they had a good attitude and had learned to keep on the watch").

    In the last talk on Sunday, which seemed pretty unscripted & of the cuff, the speaker mentioned the "watchfulness" of the FDS, and mentioned dates like 1914, 1922, 1925, etc. The idea being, even though nothing happened, it was really good that they were so "watchful".

    If I had to sum up the one point it seems the Org. wanted JWs to go home with it would be this: "Don't think of our past mistakes as a bad thing - think of them as a good thing, as evidence of just how watchful we are."

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Thank you for this summary.

    Sounds like the same crap I heard in 1985 at the "Integrity Keepers" convention, in Biloxi, Mississippi.

    Stuck on Stupid, Since 1879!

  • Dagney
    Dagney

    It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

    The ever changing explanation of the "generation," sigh. And I don't think anyone cares that is still in, really.

    Thank you for the report sir.

  • VIII
    VIII

    WTS New Math:

    "Remember when we used to look excitedly at the January 15 Watchtower, to see how many had partaken of the emblems in the previous Memorial? We were always so expectant & excited to see the number going down. Well, guess what - with this new understanding, the number of partakers completely doesn't matter! There will still be some anointed on the earth when the GT comes! So we have to be ready now."

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit