Since I don't have your background in WT theology and tactics I cannot debate your points (not that I disagree with you), but as a Evangelical I see WT theology in just about every sentence in the picture scan.
I never said Watchtower theology wasn't present in the brochure (although I see how you could have gathered that). Regardless, my point is that it is the method the brochure uses to put information forward that is the noticable change.
I find this brochure most interesting because its title claimes that the contents provide insight into the "message" of the Bible. Traditionally, the Watchtower has always asserted that it itself participates in the "message", through prophecy especially. They are the fortold "channel" apointed by God. They are the "ark" that all must flock to for saftey during Armageddeon. To prove that they are this channel, the Watchtower typcially utilized a specific pattern of arguments, arranged in a certain way.
First a book or brochure would offer somebody the hope of life on paradise earth. Next it would introduce Jehovah, as well as a history of the 'divine name'. Next would be a short discussion of Jesus, which may or may not include a condemnation of the Trinity. Everything afterword would be a constant push towards showing individuals that the Witnesses alone had certain 'Bible Truths" which are backed up by proof texts. Emphasis is put on proving that all of the worlds Christian religions are "corrupt", by focusing on issues such as the cross, trinity, hellfire, immortal soul, and so on.
For many years this was the Watchtowers message. It was certainly this way the entire time I was a witness (1997-2005). The "truth" was always presented this way. Some on this board have called it "topical" in nature, and I tend to agree. Rather than presenting a cohesive narrative, focus instead was put on certain doctranal points (as a point of referance, Watchtower publications in pre 80's era had a good bit of narrative).
The new brochure departs from this method. It is true that the Watchtower has made other brochures that don't follow this pattern, but none of those brochures carried a title that claimed the entire Bibles "message" was contained within. This is what I find interesting. Without question the Watchtower is going about creating a "public" image that is not entirely consistant with the "private" image members have of the organization. While this is no major surprise, I'm simply struck at how major parts of the Watchtowers message (1914, Faithful Slave,blood transfusions, immortal soul) are completely absent from a brochure that claims to teach the Bibles message.
For example, did Adam and Eve question God's right to rule or did they just disobey his instructions? One has to do with compliance, the other with faith or lack of. In my opinion, to back up the claims of the scan points #1 and #2 based on a reading of the first three chapters of Genesis would require a lot of reading between the line and then some
Being that I view the Genesis account as myth, Christian interpretations of the account mean very little to me. To address this point specifically, yes it is theology the Watchtower has traditionally used, but not the sort that has been put front and center (such as what I have discussed above).