I have seen one family setting themselves up for disaster. During the mid 1990s, they basically reduced their income so they can all pio-sneer. They dropped cable TV, and the father went from full time to part time work during either 1997 or 1998. By 2000, every single one of them is a pio-sneer. They showcased all the money they "saved" on taxes.
What they didn't say is how much they are going to lose in Social Security by doing this. Between that and the economy now, they are entering their 60s with zero savings, and they have little in the way of durable goods (all their stuff is crap, either because it is near the end of its life expectancy or because it was poor quality to begin with, or both). The children are grown--and, for all I know, still living with their parents as they get toward 30. Both of them work to support the family--and neither are married.
Within a few year, they are going to be up s*** creek without a paddle. The mother has diabetes in the family, while the father has heart disease in his side. The children are not exactly very healthy--I partially blame the food poisoner and the TV dinners they always eat, and the fast, good-tasting poison they always have for lunch to keep their field circus time going. And, between that and the fact that the IRS is still going to soak them on property taxes (they don't give a f*** about medical expenses--if you do not pay your property taxes, you are out). They are going to have a miserable time renting an apartment at that time--between poor health that will surely be theirs by that time, their not having enough money, and lousy potential to find a decent job (and that's if hyperinflation does not show up--if it does, it is going to be even worse).
This is going to put incredible stress on the children, who will be approaching 40 (and probably still not married, since they "owe it to their parents to bail them out for their stupid decisions). They will be working two jobs apiece, plus pio-sneering, to support their aging parents. That, plus the boasting session attendance, is going to lead those children to probably die before they reach 60--most likely from diabetes or heart disease, but with their p*** poor diet, cancer cannot be ruled out.
Do they hope Armageddon waits another 35 years or so? Oh well, it has already been 135 years since it was first supposed to have hit, so what's another 35. And that Almighty Lowlife Scumbag Jehovah doesn't give a f*** that they did all that to serve Him more fully. As with the stork that saved the wolf's life, you shouldn't expect any reward from serving the wicked.
