In the late 1960s and early 1970s, I wrote my study, “1914 and all that”. In it, I stated that at Matthew 24 Jesus warned his followers against seeing wars, earthquakes and famines as being signs. I have not wavered from that position, which I have given in my posts here at times.
In that Study, I showed that under the heading of “The History Of Eighteen Centuries Briefly Foretold”, Charles Russell showed that he too believed wars, intrigues, famines and pestilences mentioned in Matt. 24: 6-13; Mark 13: 7-13; Luke 21: 9-19; were simply a natural part of the world’s long history, during which the “true Church” would be persecuted. (Millennial Dawn, Volume 4, pages 566 – 568.)
Russell wrote: “Thus briefly did our Lord summarize secular history, and teach the disciples not to expect very soon his second coming and glorious Kingdom. And how aptly: surely the world's history is just this, — an account of wars, intrigues, famines and pestilences — little else.” (page 566)
I see no reason to amend my position that Jesus was warning his disciples against considering wars, earthquakes and such as a sign of the end. Anyway, nowhere does Jesus mention size, extent, number of casualties, intensity, and so on. He simply told them, don’t be alarmed by them, they are not signs of the end.
While “The Message” is a paraphrase of Scripture, I believe that its rendering of Matthew 24:4-8 does reflect Jesus’ intent.
Jesus said, "Watch out for doomsday deceivers. Many leaders are going to show up with forged identities, claiming, 'I am Christ, the Messiah.' They will deceive a lot of people. When reports come in of wars and rumored wars, keep your head and don't panic. This is routine history; this is no sign of the end. Nation will fight nation and ruler fight ruler, over and over. Famines and earthquakes will occur in various places. This is nothing compared to what is coming.
I have provided pages from a Tyndale commentary that addresses Matthew 24 at:
http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=0b10fc3cb9a2fc050896ce708418839c
I included some of the Commentary’s handling of Matthew 23, since that chapter bears on chapter 24.
This is a well-considered Commentary, and its views at Matthew 24 on wars and such is well presented.
Doug