No One to Carry On!

by AK - Jeff 23 Replies latest jw experiences

  • AK - Jeff
    AK - Jeff

    I recall the 'core' families that made up our little congregation in the 60's and 70's. I had not thought about it, but the very vast majority of those families have left zero members carrying on the 'legacy' of the 'troof'. Here is the way it breaks down - the names have been changed to protect the innocent [or guilty].

    The Colsons in 1970 - Dad, Mom and two sons. All in the organization. Dad a prominent elder.

    The Colsons in 2009 - One son deceased, no children left. One son as elder, no children. Dad and Mom in their 80's.

    The Colsons family that will 'carry on' the truth for the family? Zero!

    The Taylors in 1970. Bro and Sis Taylor elected to have no children.

    The Taylors in 2009. Dead. Zero to 'carry on'.

    The Jacksons in 1970. Elderly. One daughter, married to an elder, Brother Colson mentioned above.

    The Jacksons in 2009. Dead. Only child is still alive, but no grandkids as mentioned. No one to 'carry on'.

    The Grease's in 1970. Dad, never a JW. Mom, a die hard Jw. Three kids.

    The Grease's in 2009. One child deceased. The other two children and all offspring are 100% out of the organization now. No children will 'carry on'.

    The Millwick's in 1970. Dad, mom and five kids. All solid.

    The Millwick's in 2009. Dad and mom still in. All five children in various states of 'inactive'. All of the grandchildren are out of the 'truth' today. No children will 'carry on'.

    The Dud's in 1970. Dad, mom and three kids. All in the 'truth'.

    The Dud's in 2009. Dad deceased. Mom elderly. Son and his children clearly out and opposed to the religion. One daughter did not have children. One daughter had a son. That son is still 'in the truth' as far as I know. One to carry on. Maybe. He is not married yet.

    The Smyth's in 1970. Dad never in the organization. Mom dyed in the wool. Five kids.

    The Smyth's in 2009. Mom deceased. All five children out of the organization. The only one who might come back is well past the age of child birth and is childless.

    The Eckert family in 1970. Mom and Dad. Later to have four kids.

    The Eckert family in 2009. Only one of the four children is 'seriously' in the 'truth' - she has two children that I imagine will 'carry on'. All the other kids have children of their own, but as far as I know, none of them is seriously a Jw today.

    That about sums it up - literally. We had a small congo in those days, and literally none of those families has turned out to be the 'truth legacy' family here. Those third and fourth generation Jw's have all either died out or will before too many more years, with no one sticking to 'the truth' - with the exception of the two Eckert grandchildren and one Dud grandchild.

    Looking at the congo today it is not likely to fare much better, as there are several prominent couples with no children at all, and several single women who pioneered and never married.

    There were a few families that came in after 1970 who might have a few children 'carry on' - but honestly, not many at all. I would think you could count them in the single digits.

    Now that I think of it - rather than rejoice, I am saddened. So many wasted years, lives and hopes. Many of these people will die with regrets of various sorts - not least of which might be the choice to preclude having children - or their children not continuing to 'serve Jehovver'. None of them will die with a swelling pride of what their progeny 'accomplished' - since accomplishment is entirely tied up in the field service slip for them.

    Wow.

    Jeff

  • Hopscotch
    Hopscotch

    Thank you for this Jeff. When I look at my husband's family I see the same. Father died before family contacted by witnesses. Mother and her 2 sons became witnesses. Mother now 82 and desperately clinging on to the the hope of Armaggedon coming before she gets any older (the way her health is she probably won't last much longer) and dies. One son in writing dept in Brooklyn - obviously no kids. Other son, my husband now out as is our son. So no one to carry on from that family.

    The observations you made in the last paragraph are so true.

    Hopscotch

  • restrangled
    restrangled

    I think your post is a mirror of the history of this religion over and over again. It's why the 1975 debacle can be denied or absolutely ignored.

    There are few if any future generations....its just all new recruits, except for the 90 year olds in charge and being taken care of on the governing body.

    Out of my extended family since the early 1900's coming in under Russel....very, very few are left. Just the aunts and uncles now in their 70's and 80's, and just a couple of kids in one family, and I don't believe any in the 4th generation.

    r.

  • Gayle
    Gayle

    Jehovah's Witnesses - not a generational religion, not meant to be, too hard to be.

    Jehovah's Witnesses - a cult. Worse thing for cults is time. - - - -- - -oh, and also the Internet!!

  • chickpea
    chickpea

    sobering considerations, mate...

    i see it played out to a degree
    in the congro at the KH i attended
    as well.... very few can realistically
    claim to be 4th generation (the kids
    are still very young)

    the affiliation we had in the b0rg
    has left an indelible mark on all
    of us ( me, hub, 4 kids) but
    praise jah we all have escaped...
    so it is a generational legacy of sorts,
    a shame i will carry to the grave,
    as t'was me who inflicted it

  • White Dove
    White Dove

    That's really something. I'm a 4th and my kids were the 5th generation in my family. There are no more 4ths or 5ths anymore as JW's, although the family doesn't know that. My kids aren't married and don't have kids. They aren't really motivated to have any, either, because they want to put their careers first in the beginning. They are 17 and 20. My sister is almost 39 and is not married and doesn't have kids. I don't think she ever will.

  • AllTimeJeff
    AllTimeJeff

    Sobering thoughts here.

    I am a 4th (possibly 5th) generation JW. Thankfully, the line will be broken with me.

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    I have had to move to different part of the Country, so I have not kept tabs on the families that I once knew. Of my own family members, I have none of my own but nephews and nieces.

    On both sides of the family they seem to be going strong. Apart from one who is d/f'd, all the others five are dubs and their teen kids are so far still keen.

    We can only hope for change,

  • brinjen
    brinjen

    Third generation here. Grandmother converted while she was in her 20's (after hearing Rutherford's 'Million Now Living Will Never Die' talk). Her husband was an UBM. She had 3 sons and 1 daughter (my mother). Sons all left, never got baptised, Grandmother and Mother have since passed on. I was the last surviving member when I left.

  • no more kool aid
    no more kool aid

    My great grandfather became a witness, only one of his children followed, my grandfather. He had four children and only two are in the org now. Out of all their children (including me) only one remains "in". I think of so many other families and the statistics are about the same.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit