Is Shunning an Act of Revenge?

by cameo-d 60 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • isaacaustin
    isaacaustin

    coawardice, interesting thought spike.

  • isaacaustin
    isaacaustin

    coawardice, interesting thought spike.

  • isaacaustin
    isaacaustin

    coawardice, interesting thought spike.

  • Spike Tassel
    Spike Tassel

    Shunning (a form of "withdrawal") is much more neutral than "revenge" (a form of "confrontation").

  • Hoping4Change
    Hoping4Change

    I would think that it would behoove any/all JW Apologists here to provide a proper response to Mary's post. Not snipets of disagreement or snide/non-arguments; but a well put together essay addressing all the points made by Mary and why they think they are not true or do not apply. Barring any kind of such a response, how can any JW apologist response be taken seriously?

  • Spike Tassel
    Spike Tassel

    The topic is the principle, from which everything else is reasoned from.

  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    Shunning is multi-purpose.

    There is control, there is some revenge. There is fear of being shunned that keeps some from leaving or speaking up.

    Primarily, shunning separates the faithful from those that leave. This keeps them from accepting any valid reasons to leave from those that did leave. So primarily, shunning is a protection for the cult.

  • Spike Tassel
    Spike Tassel

    If a human has revenge, he is sinning and not shunning correctly. Shunning is a form of neutrality. Revenge is NOT.

  • Mary
    Mary
    I would think that it would behoove any/all JW Apologists here to provide a proper response to Mary's post. Not snipets of disagreement or snide/non-arguments; but a well put together essay addressing all the points made by Mary and why they think they are not true or do not apply. Barring any kind of such a response, how can any JW apologist response be taken seriously?

    They won't because they can't and they know it. This is a recurring theme with JW apologetics like Spike and Reniaa. They shoot their mouths off, quote a couple of scriptures, and when you prove to them using either the bible, the WTS's own publications or other historical proof, they simply ignore it.

    As mentioned before though, their sad and pathetic posts and their inability to provide anything that backs up their claims, is actually a good thing for any JW who may be lurking here.

  • Hoping4Change
    Hoping4Change
    Shunning is a form of neutrality

    Shunning for any other reasonbesides those explicitly mentioned in the bible is not a neutral act; it is an act of loyalty to the WTBTS and done so out of fear.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit