I ask this because my brother and sister-in-law have recently separated due to her infidelity. In meeting with the elders they were satisfied that she was repentant, and she avoided being df'd.
Admittedly, I wasn't present during this meeting. Knowing her the way I do, I have no doubt there were tears involved. I'm sure it was an oscar-worthy performance. However, her behavior in no way suggests repentance.
For starters, she had been reproved a year earlier for having an inappropriate relationship with a male co-worker. Also, she has made no effort since the latest episode to salvage the marriage. My brother, on the other hand, has made the effort, due to the fact that there are three young children involved. What did he get for his effort? She served him with divorce papers. And yet, according to the elders, she is truly repentant for her adultery.
I guess the question is mostly directed at former elders, those who served on judicial committees. What did you look for to judge if a person was truly repentant. The whole process seems so arbitrary to me. It seems to vary from case to case, and person to person.