They are regulated by the government and forced to behave.
Stunningly and persistently naive. Follow the money. Always follow the money.
by What-A-Coincidence 42 Replies latest jw friends
They are regulated by the government and forced to behave.
Stunningly and persistently naive. Follow the money. Always follow the money.
Stunningly and persistently naive. Follow the money. Always follow the money.
Did I say the government perfectly regulates them? No. But do you honestly think a corporation will behave on its own volition? Do you think the government should not regulate them?
My point is that regulation is needed. It will never be perfect. Why are you turning this into something about "blind trust for the government"? I don't blindly trust them. However I do think they are the best entity to regulate corporations.
How is it "namecalling" to refer to a conspiracy theorist as a conspiracy theorist?
For those who follow Cesar's laws, because the Bible says so, are you going to take the vaccine when they bust into your home to inject you?
However I do think they are the best entity to regulate corporations.
Follow the money. Where does the money come from to run presidential elections? Grass-roots voters or corporations? Who regulates the regulators? The governments who happily take lots of cash from the corporations. And if the government does do the regulating, who passes the laws that govern who regulators are chosen? The governments.
For those who place their faith in scientists, y'know, the scientists who come up with these vaccinations or advise governments on policies to do with "planned parenting", will you resist when they force you to be chemically castrated because science has decided you don't fit in their profiles?
For those who place their faith in scientists
What does that mean?
For those who place their faith in scientists
What does that mean?
---
Seriously?
Trust, confidence and other such words pertaining to faith, in scientists. I'm not trying to be oblique.
Seriously?
Trust, confidence and other such words pertaining to faith, in scientists. I'm not trying to be oblique.
I can only speak for myself, obviously.
Unless they've got some evidence backing their claims, I have no reason to accept anything from them.
Here you go. . . .
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090902-707834.html
I have no interest in "faith" in the scientists. I want to see the data.
I would also like to address a question asked by PP, earlier:
will you resist when they force you to be chemically castrated because science has decided you don't fit in their profiles?
Yes, with lethal force, if needed.