Texas execution looms after jury consult Bible

by behemot 17 Replies latest jw friends

  • behemot
    behemot

    http://www.hrea.org/index.php?base_id=2&language_id=1&headline_id=10076

    Amnesty International Press release
    9 October 2009

    As the international community prepares to mark the World Day Against the Death Penalty on 10 October, Amnesty International has highlighted two cases of people facing execution - one in the USA, one in Iran.

    A Texas man who faces execution after jurors at his trial consulted the Bible when deliberating his fate should have his death sentence commuted, Amnesty International said on Friday.

    Khristian Oliver, 32, is set to be killed on 5 November after jurors used Biblical passages supporting the death penalty to help them decide whether he should live or die.

    Amnesty International is calling on the Texas authorities to commute Khristian Oliver's death sentence. The organization considers that the jurors' use of the Bible during their sentencing deliberations raises serious questions about their impartiality.

    A US federal appeals court acknowledged last year that the jurors' use of the Bible amounted to an "external influence" prohibited under the US Constitution, but nonetheless upheld the death sentence.

    Khristian Oliver was sentenced to death in 1999 for a murder committed during a burglary. According to accomplice testimony at the trial, 20-year-old Oliver shot the victim before striking him on the head with a rifle butt.

    After the trial, evidence emerged that jurors had consulted the Bible during their sentencing deliberations. At a hearing in June 1999, four of the jurors recalled that several Bibles had been present and highlighted passages had been passed around.

    One juror had read aloud from the Bible to a group of fellow jurors, including the passage, "And if he smite him with an instrument of iron, so that he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death".

    The judge ruled that the jury had not acted improperly and this was upheld by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

    In 2002, a Danish journalist interviewed a fifth juror. The latter said that "about 80 per cent" of the jurors had "brought scripture into the deliberation", and that the jurors had consulted the Bible "long before we ever reached a verdict".

    He told the journalist he believed "the Bible is truth from page 1 to the last page", and that if civil law and biblical law were in conflict, the latter should prevail. He said that if he had been told he could not consult the Bible, "I would have left the courtroom". He described himself as a death penalty supporter, saying life imprisonment was a "burden" on the taxpayer.

    In 2008, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the jurors had "crossed an important line" by consulting specific passages in the Bible that described the very facts at issue in the case. This amounted to an "external influence" on the jury prohibited under the US Constitution.

    However, it concluded that under the "highly deferential standard" by which federal courts should review state court decisions, Oliver had failed to prove that he had been prejudiced by this unconstitutional juror conduct. In April 2009, the US Supreme Court refused to take the case, despite being urged to take it by nearly 50 former US federal and state prosecutors.

  • behemot
    behemot

    ... hope they don't consult the Bible next time they catch someone collecting wood on a Saturday (Numbers 15:32-36); uncircumcised (Exodus 4:24; check yourselves guys) or having sex with a menstruating woman (Leviticus 20:18).

    Behemot

  • MissingLink
    MissingLink

    Is everyone in Texas retarded? Or just most of them?

  • keyser soze
    keyser soze
    The judge ruled that the jury had not acted improperly and this was upheld by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

    This tells me all I need to know about Texas.

  • nelly136
    nelly136

    weird.

    arn't juries supposed to come to their conclusions from the evidence given during the case? why are they even reading bibles during jury deliberations?

  • Finally-Free
    Finally-Free

    I don't know anything about the case, but this makes me wonder where 'freedom of religion' might come in to play. What if the accused was Hindu, Sikh, or an atheist? Would he still have bible passages imposed upon him? If so, "freedom of religion" is a crock of shit in Texas.

    W

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    Wow... I wonder if they would let me to sit on a jury and decide the case based on the Ouija Board or a flip of a coin.

    Even better... while deciding the case with the rest of the jury, I'll consult the wisdom of the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy and the Bible of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. I'll send a note to the Judge asking if the defendant was in possession of a towel or spaghetti at the time of his arrest. If he didn't have at least one of them, he's obviously GUILTY!

  • JWoods
    JWoods

    What did the Texas guy actually do? --- I just found this on the internet:

    He was in the act of burglarizing the home of a 64 year old man while armed with a .380 handgun.

    When the man woke up and confronted him, Oliver shot him in the face.

    The victim was also beaten in the face and head with the butt of a rifle apparantly to make sure he was dead.

    It might be well to realize that Amnesty International does not think that ANYBODY, ANYWHERE should receive the death penalty, including that Mumia guy who killed a cop and was caught with the gun in his hand.

  • Finally-Free
    Finally-Free

    Personally I don't have a problem with a death penalty where appropriate, but I have a problem with the process used here. It can set a dangerous precedent. As ex-jws we know how easy it is to take some scriptures, twist them out of context, and make them say pretty much whatever we please. The bible has no place in the legal system, and neither does any other "holy book".

    W

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Texas is a very poor choice, if you like to get your jollies by breaking into homes and shooting people in the face.

    Did Texas adopt the express lane for cases where there are more than three eyewitnesses? I recall the comedian Ron White mentioning it.

    Ron White:

    I’m from Texas. In Texas we have the death penalty. And we USE it.

    That’s right, if you come to Texas and kill somebody, we will kill you back. That’s our policy.

    They’re trying to pass a bill right now through the Texas Legislature that will speed up the process of execution in heinous crimes where there’s more than three credible eye witnesses. If more than three people saw you do what you did, you don’t sit on death row for 15 years, Jack, you go straight to the front of the line.

    Other states are trying to abolish the death penalty … my state’s puttin’ in an express lane.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit