It's always seemed a bit odd to me that Ray Franz is the only GB member to have ever resigned, particularly for such a controversial religion.
We know from Ray Franz's books that there is often debate amongst the GB about new ideas sometimes introduced and often they are quite divided in their opinions.
I am not sure when the "Governing Body" officially began (Wikipedia's explanation is messy) but it was quite a few decades ago. There have been dozens of members of the GB since it's creation (does anyone know the exact total number?). One would think that there would have been a few more disgruntled GB members over the years who would have resigned if the GB voted against some proposal they felt very strongly about.
Why do you think there have not been more GB members who have resigned due to disagreements about policy, teachings, future direction of the organisation? Is the group so hopelessly homogenous, blindly loyal, and suffering from groupthink?
Yadda