Dear Sister Lilly:
Do you not recall that when people who spoke the “words” directed to them to speak, that they often spoke with a certain forcefulness? Didn’t the apostle Paul speak with a certain kind of “boldness”? And did not many take his “boldness” of speech, like you, as pomposity? Many people, who object to the message, in turn, settle on the “pomposity” accusation to clear themselves from having to deal with the “message.” Are you, dear sister, like them?
--Inkie
Sir Undisfellowshipped:
You write, “[W]hy do you not trust the parts where He tells His followers to read and listen to the Scriptures?” And which parts are those? Exactly? Where is it written that Jesus ever said such a thing to his follows? Pray, tell.
Also, as good as the “scriptures” are (and I grant you they are good, to a point), you do recognize that they have been meddled with—tampered with, yes? Or do you not recognize that? Let’s assume, just for the sake of this post, that you do recognize that they have been meddled with. Wouldn’t going to the Source where the truth of things is untainted be a better place to go to rather than to a source that has been tainted? I should think that “your intelligence” would tell you so. Does it?
Apparently, you also missed something important in this thread. What? That while the Bible contains “some scripture,” the Bible also contains writings that are not “scripture.” Did you not know this? In answer to your assertion that “then logically God and Jesus would NEVER contradict the teachings found in the Scriptures,” you are correct. “God and Jesus would NEVER contradict the teachings found in the Scriptures.” Nevertheless, know that the Scriptures have been tampered with—Jesus himself said so. So then, do you not recognize that TO THE EXTENT that the Scriptures have NOT BEEN TAMPERED WITH, to that extent they are correct and can be relied upon as truth that “God and Jesus would NEVER contradict. . . ?”
You ask: “If the ‘voices’ that you are hearing are contradicting the Scriptures, then why would you listen to them or trust these ‘voices’?” Do you not realize that the only reason the “voices” would contradict what is seemingly “Scripture” would be because that particular scripture has been tainted with by the “false stylus” of the Scribe to whom Jesus said: “Woe to you Scribes.” Doesn’t that make sense to you? Really? Is it not evident to you now?
I do not recall Shelby ever saying that you or anyone should ever believe her. In fact, what I do recall her saying is that you and everyone should “go to the Source”—that Source being Christ himself. But you and others refuse to go to Him, just as He said people would: “. . . but you do not want to come to me [Jesus], that you may have life.”
You also state that your “Jesus” speaks to you. Excellent! I understand what “you” are saying and in what manner you are describing he speaks to you. When you say He speaks to you by his Word, I take it you mean the Bible because you believe that the Bible is the Word. My question to you, however, is when you say He speaks to you “by His Spirit,” what exactly do you mean when you say that?
You also write that “He [Jesus] commands us to read and study and obey the teachings found in the Holy Scriptures.” Again, pray tell, where in the Bible does it say such a thing? Do tell.
And lastly, you write: “In fact, Jesus condemns any angel or voice that contradicts the Gospel and curses them to Gehenna.” You are much mistaken and in error in this assertion of yours. Jesus said no such thing. You attribute words to Jesus that He did not say or write. Be careful doing such a thing. It was the apostle Paul who penned the words you misquote here. And, by the way, Paul did not mention "Gehenna" either. You misquote much. In Galatians, chapter 1, verses 8-12, Paul writes [not Jesus]:
8However, even if we or an angel out of heaven were to declare to YOU as good news something beyond what we declared to YOU as good news, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said above, I also now say again, Whoever it is that is declaring to YOU as good news something beyond what YOU accepted, let him be accursed.
10Is it, in fact, men I am now trying to persuade or God? Or am I seeking to please men? If I were yet pleasing men, I would not be Christ’s slave. [Sister Lilly: Does Paul sound pompous here?] 11 For I put YOU on notice, brothers, that the good news which was declared by me as good news is not something human; [Whoa! Did you read that?! “Not something human.”] 12 for neither did I receive it from man [Okay!!!], nor was I taught [it] [Okay again!!!], except through revelation by Jesus Christ. [And there you go!!!]
Sister Lilly and Undisfellowshiped, may Jah bless and the Christ shine upon you.
--Inkie