Pseudo, the KISS method proves conclusively the 586/7 period of Jeru's fall. Those are the Babylonian kings, using the lengths the Wt asserts they reignedm starting at what the WT and scholars agree as a correct date of Jeru's fall of 539BCE.
Need help disproving 607BCE
by 2pink 160 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
-
White Dove
Try PROVING it! You can't. It's not in anything except for the society's literature. There is nothing mentioned in anything about it. Bet you can't even Google it except for it showing up on the society's website.
-
PSacramento
Scholar,
You seem to have missed my question so allow me to ask it again:
Has Mr Furuli engaded in any debate with Mr.Johanson ?
-
scholar
isaacaustin
Post 4209
Scholar has never been defeated by any person or any argument on this subject and on this forum and he has been posting continuously on this subject for many years. Scholar has dealt with the brightest and the dumbest and has even contended with the 'Guru of anti-WT chronology', Carl Jonsson an dfound that as always our enemies are skilled in deviousness and trickery. Integrity and loyalty to the Inspired Word of God are not their trademarks.
This is the best of hobbies and just as Doug Mason has spent decades trying to criticize WT Theology and Chronology I have spent an equal amount of time doing the exact opposite, defending same.
scholar JW
-
scholar
Greenland
Post 4880
Did you try opening the Bible and read it rather than the lazy way of using the Internet.
scholar JW
-
PSacramento
Scholar,
You post seems to be direct more at the people mentioned than their arguments.
You said you have "contended" with Mr.Jonsson ( thanks for the correction), where have you done this?
-
Black Sheep
My response to the so called KISS refutation is for advocates of this proposal to provide one basic fact that proves the validity of either 586 or 587 and refutes 607 BCE for the date of the Fall.
If there was anything wrong with the KISS approach scholar would have pounced on it 6 years ago.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
-
White Dove
The Bible doesn't lead to 607 BC, at least it doesn't in mine.
-
isaacaustin
Pseudoscholar said:
isaacaustin
Post 4209
Scholar has never been defeated by any person or any argument on this subject and on this forum and he has been posting continuously on this subject for many years. Scholar has dealt with the brightest and the dumbest and has even contended with the 'Guru of anti-WT chronology', Carl Jonsson an dfound that as always our enemies are skilled in deviousness and trickery. Integrity and loyalty to the Inspired Word of God are not their trademarks.
This is the best of hobbies and just as Doug Mason has spent decades trying to criticize WT Theology and Chronology I have spent an equal amount of time doing the exact opposite, defending same.
scholar JW
My reply: Pseudo, perhaps in your own mind you think you have never been defeated. You have actually put your foot in your mouth so many times over on this topic and have actually awakened some lurkers here. AlanF has made you look stupid in the past, as has Leolia, and just about everyone else has shown you 607 is wrong achaeologically, astrnomically, and Biblically.
-
isaacaustin
You need a WT publication, and a few illogical WT leaps of logic to conclude 607BCE