Psychology of Losing Faith

by daniel-p 34 Replies latest jw friends

  • daniel-p
    daniel-p

    I found this a very interesting article, concerning the psychological stresses involved in losing ones' faith (the title doesn't really do it justice):

    An Atheist in the Pulpit

    Public identity and private belief are never more at odds than when a preacher loses his faith. By Bruce Grierson, published on January 01, 2008 - last reviewed on April 11, 2008

    James McAllister, a 56-year-old Lutheran minister in the midwest, was working on his sunday sermon one Thursday afternoon last summer. It wasn't going well. The reverend wasn't suffering from writer's block—in fact, he was crafting quite an elegant parable about "the importance of making our whole lives a prayer." No, the problem was bigger than that. The sermon skated around a private truth that McAllister could no longer deny.

    McAllister has learned that you can tell inspirational stories, grounded in social justice and tolerance and peace, without having to bring God into the picture—and this sermon was a masterful case in point. A woman in his congregation had recently dropped everything to care for her cancer-stricken daughter, and that selfless commitment was sacred in its way. "You can see how I cook the books a little bit to make it easier to look in the mirror," he says of his sermons. "But there are times when I get that sort of empty feeling in my stomach, like I'm a fraud."

    Months ago, McAllister, who is presented pseudonymously here, took his crisis to the bishop. He'd lost the faith, he explained, and he wanted out.

    "Oh you're not quitting," she said, waving her hand dismissively. "You haven't lost your faith."

    "Um, yeah I have," McAllister said. "This is for real."

    The bishop shook her head. For the church elders, McAllister's revelations simply did not compute.

    "They're either in complete denial," he says, "or they're completely comfortable with the idea that they have a pastor who's a fraud, as long as he puts asses in the seats."

    McAllister took the issue up with his psychiatrist. "It emerged that she was a devout Christian herself," he says. "To her credit, she tried to be professional." Where she had once begun and ended their sessions with prayer, she stopped when he asked her to. "But I could see she was squirming. You know, she was sitting with a man of the cloth who had lost it. She had problems with that."

    To be a clergyman struggling with God in modern times is to reside at the center of a great battle. At a time when the tension between faith and doubt arguably defines the distance between people more than does gender or race or even politics, the Doubting Priest bears witness for the defense and the prosecution. (Mother Teresa's grave spiritual doubt, as revealed last fall in her letters, means one of two things: Either the closest thing to a modern saint was a phony, or her trials actually make her religious life more meaningful, a poignant example of faith not as a certainty but as a required test that leads to a more profound commitment.) The spiritual struggles of ministers and priests and rabbis remind us that, amid encroaching fundamentalism, atheism is also on the rise. The neo-atheist movement is fueled by outspoken academics and intellectuals including Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and others who bombard the airwaves and bestseller lists with their calls for deconversion. You can now send your kid to an atheist summer camp or get yourself certifiably "de-baptized." (Britain's national Secular Society offers the service: "Liberate yourself from the original mumbo jumbo that liberated you from the original sin you never had.") There are hundreds of college-campus groups devoted to secular humanism. The Atheist Alliance International reports "so many speaking requests that leaders of national atheist groups can't keep up."

    Even amid the neo-atheist din, a clergy member's crisis of faith stands out. The natural order of things is upset when those entrusted with the protection of souls lose the plot. Because the clergy's livelihood and public identity are intimately bound up with their faith, practical considerations can be just as pressing as theological doubt. And the split between private beliefs and public sermons can leave religious leaders feeling deeply inauthentic, a source of psychic stress that most laypeople will never know.

    Many soul-searching clergy never leave the church, making the ranks of ordained agnostics and atheists impossible to tally. But the raw numbers aren't much on the minds of clergy actually in the throes of deconversion. Their doubt is as real and immediate as a cloud over the sun. And somewhere in the nest of questions is a simple one: How did this happen?

    McAllister had been raised Catholic, then drifted into a 25-year interregnum where he stopped going to church and called himself an atheist. A midlife spiritual restlessness nudged him into chaplaincy training years ago. A second-career minister—for most of his life he was a graphic designer and a fine artist—McAllister approaches the Big Questions more in the manner of a scholar than of a monk. (Even as a Catholic grade-school kid, he recalls, he hungered for real evidence. "Why," he would ask the nuns, "did this stuff all happen so long ago before there were cameras and TVs? Why aren't there prophets and holy people and miracles now?") Frustrated with his denomination but by no means ready to bail out, he picked up Sam Harris's book The End of Faith. He found he "agreed with about 98 percent of it."

    He picked up other books in the neo-atheist canon. He read Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion, and then the one-two punch of Christopher Hitchens's mega-bestselling God Is Not Great and Sam Harris's Letter to a Christian Nation. He closed the latter book and found himself saying, aloud, "Amen." He had to face his misgivings. "I realized, it isn't just that I'm hurt by the way I was treated at synod, and it isn't just that the senior pastor that I work with was an asshole. It's that I don't believe in this anymore. And that was terrifying."

    McAllister is not just scared for himself. "I know that my parishioners look to me for comfort," he says. "They're coming to the end of their life and they want some assurance that it's all going to be OK. I have sat at the deathbed of people in my congregation and told them what I regard as lies—or fantasies, at least—just to give them comfort. I'm willing to do that up to a point, but not for the rest of my working life."

    Then there's the practical dimension. McAllister owes the church $18,000 for his schooling, at the same time as he's trying to put his last son through college. "I'm 56, which isn't a real good age to be pounding the pavement, and I've got a master's of divinity, not the most marketable degree in the world."

    McAllister's dilemma is familiar to Dan Barker, who coheads the Madison, Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF). The group spreads the word about atheism and fights legal battles to keep church and state separate. It is a soft place to land for the doubters who find it. Barker daily receives e-mails and letters from people who are wrestling with issues of faith, and he always writes back promptly and cheerily. E-mails from clergy are a very small part of the mix. But of all the stories he hears, these are the ones that resonate most—because they are his story, too.

    Richard Dawkins is convinced that McAllister's situation is common; in fact, he hopes one day to address it through "clergyman-retraining scholarships," set up through his charitable foundation, to "bridge the gap between living a lie and getting a new life," as he puts it.

    Barker was a religious prodigy. Raised attending a charismatic Pentecostal church near Disneyland, he received "the call" at age 15, and wasted no time spreading the good news. He converted his high-school Spanish teacher. He became part of an evangelical team that went door-to-door holding revival meetings. He penned and performed popular Christian jingles.

    But after a milestone birthday, number 30, came and went in 1979, Barker found himself agitated. Creatively, he was stalled; he was having trouble working on a Christian musical about a lost lamb, "because," he explains, "my views were changing while I was trying to write it." The restlessness, he determined, was spiritual. "It was as if there was a little knock on my skull and somebody was saying, 'Hello! Anybody home?' I was starving and didn't know it, like when you work hard on a project and forget to eat and don't know you are hungry until you are really hungry."

    He began reading widely outside the Christian canon: science magazines, psychology, philosophy. It was the liberal-arts education he never had, and what followed was "a slow but steady migration across the theological spectrum" that took about five years. (Among the deeply faithful, doubt is often first stoked with exposure to the "outside world.")

    As he carried on a secret life of secular reading, Barker phased out the fire-and-brimstone sermons. "But even then I felt hypocritical, often hearing myself mouth words about which I was no longer sure, but words that the audience wanted to hear."

    The confirmation, as Barker interpreted it, came one night in November, as he lay on a burlap cot in a church in a Mexican border town where he'd come to give a guest sermon. As he peered out at a splash of stars, Barker had a sudden profound sensation that had nothing to do with intellect, the kind of deeply felt moment more commonly associated with finding God than losing Him. He was, Barker understood, utterly alone here.

    "For my whole life there had been this giant eyeball looking at me, this god, this holy spirit, this church history, and this Bible. And not only everything I did but everything I thought was being judged: Was God pleased? I realized that that wasn't there anymore. It occurred to me, 'I own these thoughts. Nobody knows what I'm thinking right now. There's no fear of hell, no fear of judgment, I don't have to be right or wrong, I can just be me.'" It felt as if charges had been dropped for a crime for which he had been falsely accused. It was exhilarating and frightening all at once. "When you're ready to jump out of an airplane to skydive, you can be terrified but excited at the same time," he says. "There's a point where you go, all right, let's do this."

    Says Barker: "we surveyed our members some years ago, asking them: "If you were raised religious, why did you change your mind?" There was no one answer. Some people gave social reasons: the way the church treats women. Some people gave reasons like, 'the fear of hell—I just couldn't live with that.' But the answer people gave more often than any other was that it was intellectual: Religion eventually just did not make sense."

    Looking back, Tom Reed, a former Roman Catholic priest from Mississippi, can pretty clearly identify his own moment of truth. It followed a quick succession of historical events: the 1968 Vatican statement upholding opposition to birth control and the death of Martin Luther King Jr. The two events finished off Reed's faith in the church and his faith in God.

    For Reed, deconversion was almost as quick and binary as the flick of a switch. At a certain point, he says, "it was suddenly clear that the courageous thing to do was to just admit that this is all made up.

    "I remember waking up one day saying, I'm going to practice being an atheist, just move through the day with that in mind. It had become a part of my being, the idea that God was ultimately responsible for everything that was happening. Now I proceeded from the assumption that there was no God in the picture."

    continued: http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200712/atheist-in-the-pulpit?page=3

  • MadGiant
    MadGiant

    Thanks

    Ismael

  • Dagney
    Dagney

    Wow. Great article.

    "For my whole life there had been this giant eyeball looking at me, this god, this holy spirit, this church history, and this Bible. And not only everything I did but everything I thought was being judged: Was God pleased? I realized that that wasn't there anymore. It occurred to me, 'I own these thoughts. Nobody knows what I'm thinking right now. There's no fear of hell, no fear of judgment, I don't have to be right or wrong, I can just be me.'" It felt as if charges had been dropped for a crime for which he had been falsely accused. It was exhilarating and frightening all at once. "When you're ready to jump out of an airplane to skydive, you can be terrified but excited at the same time," he says. "There's a point where you go, all right, let's do this."

    Those words could have been penned by me.

    Thanks for sharing that.

  • wobble
    wobble

    " I CAN JUST BE ME. "

    That thought has occurred to me ever since I left the Cult that is Jehovah's Witnesses.

    It is a wonderful freedom, to be cherished and used.

    Thank you for posting this account, it must resonate with so many on this board.

    love

    Wobble

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Religion eventually just did not make sense.

    That is the easiest way to summarize my own feelings. With many believers, the opposite is true. The thought of no god just doesn't make any sense to them.

  • DrJohnStMark
    DrJohnStMark

    daniel-p: "They're either in complete denial," he says, "or they're completely comfortable with the idea that they have a pastor who's a fraud, as long as he puts asses in the seats."

    After I left (and I almost had got in the 'JW clergy') I heard some local JW elders had commented on it: "He'll be back." Fat chance.

    On my side, there's been a difficulty to comprehend that we do not live for ever. As a born in, I was so deep in the JWism... we were not supposed to die and no loss was to be critical. I've been now out of the org for a long time and sometimes a few years pass without thinking too much about the past but still, when I for some reason get worried about my personal future or foresee some permanent loss, then for a while I do feel like an ex-jw... so were those JW friends right? I do have learned a lot about the psychological mechanisms behind this and the rational side of me can convincingly tell the other side why I am feeling like that. First, after I quit the JWs, I decided to forget about all wtBtS for good. Now I do recognize that it is going to be part of me and it is a bit easier. I accept I'll be back on these boards again and again but never in the org (or any other organized religion). And I can understand their comment.

  • daniel-p
    daniel-p

    Dagney: I thought that paragraph was dead-on, too. Could have been written by an ex-JW.

    leavingwt: That's the way I see it too. There are really two groups: those who lose faith in their religion, and those who lose faith in God. It seems the groups go through many of the same steps in dealing with disillusionment and feeling like a personal failure.

    Something that really stood out to me was this part:

    "Richard Dawkins is convinced that McAllister's situation is common; in fact, he hopes one day to address it through "clergyman-retraining scholarships," set up through his charitable foundation, to "bridge the gap between living a lie and getting a new life," as he puts it."

    It seems that there are systems to help people through hard stages of their life, like getting sick, being disabled, becoming pregnant, being poor, etc., but not a lot of consideration given to those who were once ministers who now have to be re-introduced to the world. For someone who's never been in that situation, the extraordinary challenges involved might not be apparent. But this probably constitutes a substantial social cost to society. How many lives are essentially wasted because ex-clergy types can't adapt to life outside of their previous religious structure? This "clergy-retraining scholarship" idea has a lot of merit, in my opinion.

  • daniel-p
    daniel-p

    After I left (and I almost had got in the 'JW clergy') I heard some local JW elders had commented on it: "He'll be back." Fat chance.

    On my side, there's been a difficulty to comprehend that we do not live for ever. As a born in, I was so deep in the JWism... we were not supposed to die and no loss was to be critical. I've been now out of the org for a long time and sometimes a few years pass without thinking too much about the past but still, when I for some reason get worried about my personal future or foresee some permanent loss, then for a while I do feel like an ex-jw... so were those JW friends right? I do have learned a lot about the psychological mechanisms behind this and the rational side of me can convincingly tell the other side why I am feeling like that. First, after I quit the JWs, I decided to forget about all wtBtS for good. Now I do recognize that it is going to be part of me and it is a bit easier. I accept I'll be back on these boards again and again but never in the org (or any other organized religion). And I can understand their comment.

    Drjohnstmark: Belief in the "live forever" doctrine was one of the most pysychologically distressing things for me to go through, as well. After I got over the initial feelings of desperation, I realized that accepting life as it is presented to us (birth, life, death, the end) is a very liberating thing. It didn't make me nihilistic, as many theists like to presume, but exactly the opposite. Since this life is probably all we have, everything we do matters.

    I hope you keep coming around JWN.

  • Open mind
    Open mind

    Thanks for sharing this Daniel P.

    om

  • DrJohnStMark
    DrJohnStMark

    daniel-p: Belief in the "live forever" doctrine was one of the most pysychologically distressing things for me to go through, as well.

    On the intellectual side, I now think that, exactly because there may not be any God behind this all, life is more valuable than ever: It is something extraordinary. On the emotional side, as I said, some work remains to be done.

    If life was something that God could create and destroy at will anywhere he/she wants to, would it really be valuable? My way of thinking about the world is now very much based on science, yet I think it may be that the existence of life is not so trivial at all. My daughter's smile reminds me of that every day.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit