Curious, and accurate question jwfacts.
I believe that I am most severely impacted, culturally and emotionally, by Christianity, being reared in the west, and currently surrounded by mostly Christian people. In the writings of Santayana, mentioned above by Drew Sagan [and thanx for that ref Drew], in his volume entitled 'Life of Reason', he says;
"What religion a man shall have is a historical accident, quite as much as what language he shall speak." [Volume 'Reason in Religion' page 5]
It just seems simpler to principly identify with the populace in general, whilst at the moment at least, satifying internal hungers from outside the general pervue. While I agree in general principle with the words of Jesus on some subjects and object lessons, the peaceful harmony of Zen and the symbolisms of eastern culture seem to more fit my soul at the moment. And while I feel no need to proselitize my philosophy or opinion on life to those around me, it seems more suitable to 'fit' than to 'fight' the general mold of my environment. Those who come to know me well will soon enough come to grasp that my viewpoint is 'unusual', but hopefully at that point the prejudice is abated toward those views a bit. I believe religion [or even reference to it] to be a sensitive subject to many. I also view all religion as pragmatism of sorts. And this pragmatism is relatively consistent thoughout religious thought.
You are right though - as the cloak falls over time, I might indeed revise the 'label'.
Jeff