Changes after 1942 are new light from God or an apostasy by the Devil's influence?

by Andrew Derevyanko 49 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • JWoods
    JWoods

    LOL Sweeney. You know - I have heard popularity for the theory of a "great apostacy breakoff" after Russell died - but never after foul-mouthed, greedy, boozing, womanizing Rutherford!!!

    BTW, it was pretty apostate as far as false prophecy based on numerology during the Russell time frame from point of origin with the Adventism.

  • PSacramento
    PSacramento

    I think that With Rutherford, many changes came that had to do with his wanting control and prestige greater than what Russell had.

    It was under his watch that the door-to-door crap started, that whole 1914 got blown out of whack, the banning of Christmas and such.

    The JW becoming an isolationst relgion started under Riutherford.

    I don't know if it was under him to that the whole BS of "only under the WT can you understand the bible" started.

  • JWoods
    JWoods
    I don't know if it was under him to that the whole BS of "only under the WT can you understand the bible" started.

    I believe that it was - certainly, Rutherford did a completely ruthless campaign agains the former Russellite independent bible study congregations, the elective elders, and so on. All in the name of centralized control -- and the "only under the WT" idea is central to that.

  • The Almighty Homer
    The Almighty Homer

    Rutherford tried to spin peoples heads 180 degrees in the opposite direction against the largely establish Christian based faiths

    already established and circumvent the suggestion that the only true worship toward god had to come from his own devised religion only.

    Only problem is he in doing so he created himself is own discriminatory falsehoods. Most are still adhered to today by the modern JWS.

    This proclamation of being the only organization that god approves and is being guided as such has brought on its own forwarding and evolving problems.

    Its amazing how much salable corruption can be put into action by certain men and still people will follow them like they have a ring in their noses.

    Perhaps its true then power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely

  • hamsterbait
    hamsterbait

    YOU CAN GUARANTEE that arguments like this will be used to ditch the 1914 -1919 teachings on the "Slave" and the invisible "Return" in 1914 ( which is already DITCHED see the "Proclaimers Book" p. 136.

    In fact, now they are denying that Christ returned "even invisibly" to the earth in 1914, I expect thay will argue along the lines of the UN/ Beast teaching.

    "True the Bible Students thought 1914 marked the end of 2520 years since the destruction of Jerusalem in 606 BCE, however the incorrect understanding helped them to correctly identify the beginning of the "Time of the End" as 1914.

    ( The same argument was used about the UN - a WRONG understanding of "the Disgusting Thing " enabled them to CORRECTLY (wtf????????) identify the Wild Beast.)

    They can drop 1914 anytime. They dropped 1874, and there was not a murmur.

    HB

  • JWoods
    JWoods

    Sadly true, Hamsterbait. See also that they dropped "Millions Now Living Will Never Die" and "The Generation Living and Understanding of 1914".

    They have mangled the blood doctrine so completely that the actions of Count Dracula would be a matter of conscience now - so long as he sucked it out one fraction at a time.

    Defacto abandonment of the hatred for the United Nations - by actually joining it. Of course, then denial. But still -

    Not a word from the masses, hardly even an upraised eyebrow.

  • The Almighty Homer
    The Almighty Homer

    One thing that is certain religion can change any direction it needs to, to deem themselves viable before the public,

    the WTS. from its beginning has done so many times and will most likely do so in the future.

    New lies to cover up old lies new light to cover up old new light, I even see the possibility into the future of a new name taken on,

    to replace the JWS name, a reformation to bemoan the old JWS organization. Why do I assume that ? because the organization has never in its history

    has it been so exposed like it has since the introduction of the inter-net. They are indeed cowering backwards with little place to go,

    perhaps when they move completely to Wakekill they may take on a new identity, with a accompanying change in doctrines.

    Be assured though that the top cats will try their utmost best to hang on to the millions and the supposed power offered.

  • Mickey mouse
    Mickey mouse
    Not a word from the masses, hardly even an upraised eyebrow.

    Raising an eyebrow is risky business in a high control group. The organization is in decline though and I would not dismiss the effects of all the recent changes in doctrine.

  • mkr32208
    mkr32208

    No, there is no limit, there will always be mentally ill people who suffer from varying degrees of religiosity. Just feel sorry for them as you close the thread and hope they get on the right meds!

  • agonus
    agonus

    Want to figure out the difference between new light, apostasy, and truth? Use this simple WT formula:

    Step 1: New Light arrives. Current New Light is now truth. Previous (obsolete) New Light is now apostasy (though it wasn't while we were teaching it). Future New Light (i.e. running ahead of Jehovah's chariot) is not yet Current New Light and therefore apostasy.

    Step 2: Future New Light becomes Current New Light, replacing current Current New Light, which is now obsolete (apostasy).

    Step 3: Previous New Light (apostasy) becomes Future New Light (still apostasy until becoming Current New Light).

    Step 4: Repeat from Step 1 until brain implodes.

    See "This Generation" teaching(s) for a demonstration of this process.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit