Should Jehovah Witnesses have Cats?

by RAS 19 Replies latest jw friends

  • RAS
    RAS

    NEW LIGHT!

    There are numerous reasons why a loyal dedicated servant of God should use his Bible-trained conscience to arrive at a proper understanding of why cats are not advisable as pets or companions for Christians. Consider, then, the following facts:

    It was a common practice in ancient Egypt to worship or idolize cats as 'gods'. Indeed, after death many cats were mummified, venerated and sacrifices were made to them. As Christians we observe not only the Mosaic Law, but also the 'necessary things,' identified by the Apostles at Jerusalem, to include the following edict: '(1) Abstain from sacrifices to idols'. We are to 'guard ourselves from idols' and 'worship no other gods'. Such feline influence could lead to idolatry and thereby 'grieve Jehovah's Spirit' with tragic consequences. May we never take for granted Jehovah's wise and generous counsel brought to you by your spiritual brothers in the pages of this magazine!

    The Bible does not say that cats were not present at Herod's birthday party when John the Baptist was beheaded. History shows that cats were most likely present at this tragic party that Jehovah did not approve of. Clearly then, as loyal Christians, why would we even want to associate with animals that are without a doubt of such bad influence, remembering how true are the Bible's words: 'Bad associations spoil useful habits'! -1 Cor. 15:33. Some have exposed themselves to possible spiritual contamination in this way. To invite cats in our house is to toy with disaster. Can one deny that the chance exists that the same grave consequences could visit your home that fell upon John? Clearly, God disapproved of this 'birthday' party. Should we not then disapprove (without showing any malicious intent, only Godly hatred) of cats the way the scriptures recommend?

    The scriptures clearly indicate that neither Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, faithful Job, the Apostles, Jesus nor any other human bearing God's favor himself owned a cat. Should we simply assume that this is a mere coincidence? Surely not! This was most likely because they didn't want to be like the pagan contemporaries of their respective days who showed no regard for how God feels about owning a cat. In harmony with the pattern set by the faithful prophets and worthies of old, it would therefore not be fitting for the true Christian today to own a cat.

  • finallysomepride
    finallysomepride

    Yes Yes Yes, stuff what the GB may say, always had them as pets while I was in

  • Decided
    Decided

    Didn't Noah have a pet cat on the ark?

    Ken P.

  • finallysomepride
    finallysomepride

    Sure Did, a large variety of them damnit

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    This typical of the twisted kind a reasoning the WTS would use if it decided to go down the Cat Ban route. I read something similar to this a couple of years ago and for a moment (very briefly) thought it really was from the WTS. It is obviously a spoof before any cat owning lurkers get concerned.

  • DrJohnStMark
    DrJohnStMark

    No, they should have lions.

  • RAS
    RAS

    This is not from the WT but it is shows how easy it is to take scripture out of context and create your own theology.

  • Lillith26
    Lillith26

    The scriptures clearly indicate that neither Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, faithful Job, the Apostles, Jesus nor any other human bearing God's favor himself owned a cat.

    Cats? no... Slaves? yes... More than one wife? yes... Hmmmn....

  • I quit!
    I quit!

    Also cat aren't obedient and will never take direction from Jehovah's fateful and excrete slave. Or is that faith and discrete? Well anyway cats won't listen.

  • zoiks
    zoiks

    Cats are not sheeplike

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit