Certainly calls to mind the cover from the 'Six Myths About Christianity' public WT recently. I wondered if they did some digital technology (ie. a guy sitting at a pew in front of a blue screen while the church building was digitally placed around him) or if they actually went into a church for that. Hmm. Of course, in hindsight, it all makes more sense. Anything is justifiable if it creates more followers. If they can overtly use double standards and even lie as necessary, what's the big deal about going into a church and sitting at a pew with a cross or rosary beads? It's a DF'ing offense for us, but for those in power, it's no big deal.
Remember, too, that the research that goes into the literature itself relies on what? Outside sources--Bible commentaries written by people who are not JWs. Bottom line? It's just another religion. The only main difference is that its adherents do not realize it.
SD-7