My almost 80 year old elderly JW father is getting remarried.....

by skeeter1 22 Replies latest jw friends

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    > My almost 80 year old elderly JW father is getting remarried.....

    80 years old and still a glutton for punishment.

  • Billy the Ex-Bethelite
    Billy the Ex-Bethelite

    Dad didn't mention anything about a judicial committee saying they HAD to get married?

    After the last CO talk, my dad got the clear message that many old-timers like him should be prepared to die in this system. More and more realize that the end isn't coming very soon. If they want any such fleshly pleasures, they'd better enjoy them now before they get resurrected genderless. Doesn't sound like paradise to me.

  • lisavegas420
    lisavegas420
    But, I'm not sure why he is doing it...

    Just last night, I said to my husband... isn't it sad that some people have no one to snuggle with.

    Can you imagine night after night of being in your most vulnerable state, and there's no one there to reach out to you or hold close.

    I'm happy your dad has someone to snuggle with.

    lisa

  • Robdar
    Robdar

    I think it's sweet your dad and his fiancee have found love and companionship again. And how wonderful your new stepmom does not plan to shun you. She sounds like a good woman.

  • freddo
    freddo

    I think you did put doubts in his mind - as did his life's experience too. Well, good for you skeeter and good for them too.

  • pirata
    pirata

    Could be that he did some "research" and discovered that the offical WT policy is that resurrected ones don't get married.

    *** w87 6/1 pp. 30-31 Questions From Readers ***
    Questions From Readers
    ? Is it wise for a Christian whose mate has died to remain single in the hope of being reunited in the future?
    How fine it is that a Christian should feel love for his or her mate even after that one has died! Some in this situation have remained
    single, not because of being content with singleness, but in hopes of resuming the marriage after the resurrection. While not being
    insensitive to the human feelings behind those hopes, we encourage such ones to consider some Biblical points.
    For instance, bearing on the matter are the apostle Paul’s words: “A wife is bound during all the time her husband is alive. But if her
    husband should fall asleep in death, she is free to be married to whom she wants, only in the Lord. But she is happier if she remains as she
    is.” (1 Corinthians 7:39, 40) This shows that the marital bond ends when one’s mate dies. It was a kindness for God to inform Christians
    of this, for thus widows and widowers can weigh their emotional and other needs in deciding whether to remarry; they are not bound to the
    deceased.—1 Corinthians 7:8, 9.

    Does the Bible, though, indicate whether resurrected ones will be able to marry or to resume a previous marriage that was ended by a death?
    One account seems to bear on this question. It involved Sadducees who, while not even believing in the resurrection, came to Jesus trying to
    entrap him. They presented this problem involving brother-in-law marriage: “There were seven brothers; and the first took a wife and
    died childless. So the second, and the third took her. Likewise even the seven: they did not leave children behind, but died off. Lastly,
    the woman also died. Consequently, in the resurrection, of which one of them does she become the wife?”—Luke 20:27-33; Matthew 22:23-28.

    Christians are not under the Law, but a similar difficulty could be raised concerning them. For example: Brother and Sister C—— were
    married and had two children. Then he died. Sister C—— loved and deeply missed him, but she felt a need for companionship, financial
    support, sexual expression, and help with the children. So she married Brother M——, which union was as Scriptural as the first. Later he
    became ill and died. If the former mates were resurrected and marriage were possible, whom might she marry?
    Consider Jesus’ response to the Sadducees: “The children of this system of things marry and are given in marriage, but those who have
    been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. In
    fact, neither can they die anymore, for they are like the angels, and they are God’s children by being children of the resurrection. But
    that the dead are raised up even Moses disclosed . . . when he calls Jehovah ‘the God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob.’ He is
    a God, not of the dead, but of the living, for they are all living to him.”—Luke 20:34-38; Matthew 22:29-32.

    Some have felt that Jesus was here referring to the heavenly resurrection, yet there are reasons to believe that his reply was
    about the earthly resurrection in the coming “system of things.” What reasons underlie this view? Those questioning Jesus did not believe in
    him or know about a heavenly resurrection. They asked about a Jewish family under the Law. In reply Jesus referred to Abraham, Isaac, and
    Jacob, men who hoped for life again on earth. (Genesis 42:38; Job 14:13-15; compare Hebrews 11:19.) Those patriarchs, and millions of
    others, who are raised on earth and who prove faithful will be “like the angels.” Though mortal, they will not die once God has declared
    them righteous for endless life.

    Human emotions today might make this a difficult conclusion to accept. But it is to be noted that nowhere does the Bible say that God’s
    resurrecting the faithful means restoring their marital status. Hence, no one believes that if Aquila and Priscilla have gained life in
    heaven, they have resumed their marriage. (Acts 18:2) And Joseph and Mary will evidently live in different realms—he on earth and she in
    heaven. (John 19:26; Acts 1:13, 14) Since none of us have lived in heaven, we cannot say what feelings Aquila, Priscilla, and Mary might
    have there, yet we can be sure of their finding full contentment in their heavenly service.

    Similarly, we have never lived as perfect humans. Thus we cannot be sure how we will feel about past relationships if and when we gain
    perfect human life in a paradise. It is good for us to remember that when Jesus made that statement he was a perfect human and therefore in
    a better position than we to appreciate the feelings of those who are “counted worthy of gaining that system of things.” We can also trust
    that Jesus is able to ‘sympathize with our present weaknesses.’ (Hebrews 4:15) So if a Christian finds it hard to accept the
    conclusion that resurrected ones will not marry, he can be sure that God and Christ are understanding. And he can simply wait to see what
    occurs.

    There is no reason now to overemphasize this matter. The psalmist wrote: “Know that Jehovah is God. It is he that has made us, and not
    we ourselves. We are his people and the sheep of his pasturage . . . Give thanks to him, bless his name. For Jehovah is good.” (Psalm
    100:3-5) Our good God will certainly provide amply for our true needs if we are “counted worthy of gaining that system of things.”—Job
    34:10-12; Psalm 104:28; 107:9.

    God’s goodness is reflected also in his informing us that the death of a mate concludes the marriage. (Romans 7:2) Thus anyone who has lost a
    mate can know that he or she is free to remarry now if that seems needed or best. Some have remarried, thereby helping to fill their own
    present needs and those of their family. (1 Corinthians 7:36-38; Ephesians 6:1-4) Consequently, a Christian whose mate has died should
    not feel obliged to remain mateless now out of an expectation that former marriage mates will be reunited in the resurrection to life
    here on earth in the coming system.

    [Footnotes]
    If an Israelite died before his wife brought forth a son who could
    receive the inheritance, the man’s brother had to marry the widow with
    the view of producing a son by her.—Deuteronomy 25:5-10.

    *** w67 10/15 pp. 638-640 Questions From Readers ***
    Questions From Readers
    ? Do Jesus’ words at Luke 20:34-36 apply to the earthly resurrection
    or to the heavenly resurrection of the 144,000?—W. D., Australia.

    We frequently receive inquiries on these verses, which read: “The children of this system of things marry and are given in marriage, but
    those who have been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in
    marriage. In fact, neither can they die any more, for they are like the angels, and they are God’s children by being children of the
    resurrection.”

    It is understandable that Christians might be concerned about marriage prospects in the resurrection, since the strongest human emotional
    ties are often with regard to one’s mate. Many faithful servants of God who look forward to living forever on earth and whose mates have
    died would like to have support for their hope that they could be reunited as husband and wife in the resurrection. While not being
    callous to their sincere feelings, we must admit that apparently Jesus’ words apply to the earthly resurrection, and they indicate that
    those resurrected will not marry or be reunited in a marriage relationship with former mates.

    In order to appreciate why this position is held, it would be beneficial to consider the setting of Jesus’ words. Matthew 22:23-33
    could be read with profit. In an attempt to outwit Jesus the Sadducees posed a problem: A Jewish Woman lost her husband before producing any
    children. In accord with the law of brother-in-law marriage given at Deuteronomy 25:5-10, she married her deceased husband’s brother and
    progressed through seven brothers without producing children, each of the husbands dying. The Sadducees asked whose wife she would be in the
    resurrection.—Luke 20:28-33.

    The Jews had knowledge and hope of an earthly resurrection, even though these opposing Sadducees did not accept the resurrection hope
    plainly set out in the Hebrew Scriptures. (Isa. 25:8; Job 14:13; Dan. 12:13) In his reply Jesus did not avoid answering their question by
    speaking about the resurrection to heavenly life. They had presented a problem involving Jews under the Mosaic law who died before Jesus
    opened the way to heavenly life, and Christ logically replied on this basis: “In the resurrection neither do men marry nor are women given
    in marriage, but are as angels in heaven.”—Matt. 22:30.

    Further showing that Jesus had in mind an earthly resurrection, as recorded at Matthew 22:31, 32 and Luke 20:37, 38, he referred to
    Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and proved by the information that Moses was given at the burning bush that these patriarchs would be resurrected
    from the dead. Well, what Scriptural hope is there for these men? They will have an earthly resurrection, having died before Jesus opened the
    way to heavenly life or held out that hope for a small number of mankind. (Matt. 11:11; Acts 2:34; Heb. 10:19, 20) So the entire
    discussion here is about an earthly resurrection and not about a resurrection that results in life in heaven with the angels there.
    This has long been understood and taught by Jehovah’s witnesses. As far back as The Watchtower of November 15, 1904, page 345, we read in
    a discussion of these verses: “True the glorified Church will not marry, but there is no reference here to the Church class, the Bride
    class. The question did not refer to saints, but to any ordinary Jews under the Law. . . . Nothing in the illustration implied that either
    the woman or any of her husbands were followers of the Lord.” How, then, will those raised to earthly life be like the angels? The
    angels in heaven do not marry and procreate, producing angelic offspring. Yet they can enjoy satisfying association with myriads of
    other spirit creatures serving God. Similarly, those who in this present wicked system of things prove themselves worthy of gaining a
    resurrection in the new order or the coming system of things will not marry and produce offspring. (2 Cor. 4:4; Mark 10:30) Immediately upon
    resurrection they become “God’s children by being children of the resurrection.” Their heavenly “Father,” the one giving them life by
    resurrecting them, has determined that they will not marry, though they will be in position to receive many other blessings at his hand,
    not the least of which will be the privilege of close and warm association with other earthly servants of God.

    Additionally, the ones who are resurrected to earthly life and who prove their integrity to God through the millennium and the final test
    to follow will be recognized by God as being righteous and so will be given everlasting life. (Rev. 20:5, 7-10) When once Jehovah has
    declared them righteous by recognizing their human perfection and righteousness, no other person in heaven or on earth can destroy them
    without God’s permission and according to his will. (Rom. 8:33) The angels are mortal, as proved by the fact that Satan and the demons
    will be destroyed. (Matt. 25:41) Despite their mortality the faithful angels live on forever. Those resurrected to earthly life who are
    declared righteous by God will live and be blessed by Jehovah forever even though they are mortal like the angels.
    So while it is true that the 144,000 raised to heavenly life will not marry, evidently Jesus, in making the comments at Luke 20:34-36, was
    not speaking about this small fraction of those to be resurrected. But, rather, in accord with the question posed, he was speaking about
    the earthly resurrection and what will be the situation for the thousands of millions raised from the dead to earthly life.

    As indicated by correspondence we have received, this conclusion is one difficult for some to accept because of the strong influence of
    human emotions. While we can sincerely sympathize with those who have lost mates in death, we must honestly admit that the conclusion
    discussed above is the one suggested in the Scriptures. Since this is all God’s Word says about it, when asked what the Bible indicates on
    this topic, we can but explain matters in this way. If, though, this Scriptural conclusion seems hard for one to accept,
    is it wise to become upset over the matter and let this question interfere with one’s faith? No, it would be far better to leave the
    matter in God’s hands. Jehovah is a God of loving-kindness, understanding and mercy. (Ex. 34:6; Job 12:13; Isa. 60:10) He will not
    act unjustly toward those who have his favor. As Elihu said to Job, “for a fact, God himself does not act wickedly, and the Almighty
    himself does not pervert judgment.” (Job 34:12) While humans might now think they will have certain needs and desires, we personally have
    never lived under the perfect conditions God has in store for mankind. He knows what perfect humans need, and we can be certain he will
    provide for all the needs of his “children of the resurrection,” as well as the Armageddon survivors. We can rest assured that the
    inspired words at Psalm 145:16 will prove true then: “You are opening your hand and satisfying the desire of every living thing.” What God
    has promised for those Who love him and serve him faithfully, everlasting life in peace, health, happiness and contentment, will be
    the possession of all who have his approval in the new order. What a joy it will be to fellowship with friends and relatives united by the
    bonds of Christian love and the service of Jehovah. That will truly be a rich and satisfying life!

    The Bible does not provide all the details about the resurrection and how things such as family matters and child training will be arranged
    on the earth in the new system of things. We can be certain, though, that Jehovah is going to do what is loving and absolutely just. In
    fact, he is going to do what is perfect and right to a degree that our imperfect minds cannot even conceive. Thus we can in faith rely on
    Moses’ words at Deuteronomy 32:4: “The Rock, perfect is his activity, for all his ways are justice. A God of faithfulness, with whom there
    is no injustice; righteous and upright is he.”

  • ninja
    ninja

    I hope he's on a viagra drip

  • yesidid
    yesidid
    I hope he's on a viagra drip.

    Ahhh the ignorance of the young.

    It's probably best not to judge others by ones self.

  • Mary
    Mary
    But, isnt' it wierd that two, active and very elderly JWs would remarry in this "System of things", especially if they whole-heartedly believe Paradise is close by? It's one thing to be in youth's passionate hormonal rage and marry, expecting a life of many years together . . . but, both of these people are going to likely die in a few years (my dad's in not good heatlh, to boot).

    I think deep down, most Witnesses either do not believe "the End" is nigh and they do not want to live by themselves the rest of their lives when they've been used to having someone there. When a Witness friend of mine died about 3 years ago, she and her husband were absolutely 100% dedicated Witnesses who absolutely believed Armageddon would be here any second. Yet after she died, her husband re-married within a year. He told some friends that he did not love this woman like he did his first wife, but he was "lonely" so he got remarried. I remember thinking "so if Armageddon is so close, why wouldn't you just be waiting for Betty to get a resurrection?"

    Lonliness can be a powerful factor. I truly hope your dad enjoys his new wife and the rest of their lives.

  • choosing life
    choosing life

    They don't believe the marriage bond lasts past death, so why not move on and find a companion to live out your life with? Most jws I have seen have no trouble remarrying after losing their mate in death. There have been a few who said they would marry again in the "new system", but that really goes against what they teach.

    Almost 80 and getting married? That is wonderful. I hope they bring each other joy. I can't imagine going through those elderly years alone.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit