Were any of you really bothered/still bothered by the practice of field service reporting?
There was an old post on here that got me thinking how the practice got started.
Instead of simply being a tool to monitor the progress of the faith, or to see if the work was done "throughout the earth", it appears to me that it was just a tool used to keep the presses rolling and to see how much literature to produce - along with controlling the rank and file. The average JW gives it no thought, its just another "blessing" from the organization when you hear the monthly reports, etc.
The organization is so statistics-driven that they make Jesus out to be a CEO with people who need to meet their sales quotas.I'm sure he really wouldnt care if Peter and Andrew got 20 hours one month and John got 25. Wait, maybe thats why John was "beloved"
When I first started to have questions about the organization, the first thing I mentioned to my wife was the practice of field service reporting. I told her I think its used to control people, make them feel guilty, etc. Its also used to measure "spirituality". The first thing used to evaluate an elder or a MS is "How many hours does he average in field service?" You could be a wonderful shepherd, kind, true Christian, but if you dont have 10 hours a month in service, you are not considered whatsoever. Then you get counseled - "Well if you want to "reach out" you need to get your field service time up." How many times did you see an A-hole appointed in the congregation simply because he was male and had 10 hours a month in service?
The whole thing is a total joke.