Pledge of Allegiance in Schools Ruled Constitutional

by Dogpatch 11 Replies latest jw friends

  • Dogpatch
    Dogpatch

    Pledge of Allegiance in Schools Ruled Constitutional (Update1)

    By Joel Rosenblatt and Karen Gullo

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aVwtVb7Pg9g0

    March 11 (Bloomberg) -- Reciting the Pledge of Allegiance with its reference to God in public schools doesn’t violate the U.S. Constitution’s separation of church and state, a federal appeals court ruled.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco disagreed with Michael Newdow, an atheist who sued a school district near Sacramento, California, challenging the use of the phrase “under God” in the pledge.

    “We hold that the Pledge of Allegiance does not violate the establishment clause because Congress’ ostensible and predominant purpose was to inspire patriotism,” the court said it today’s decision. “For this reason, the phrase ‘one nation under God’ does not turn this patriotic exercise into a religious activity.”

    The court reversed an injunction that had prohibited recitation of the pledge at the district’s schools.

    In a separate case brought by Newdow, the appeals court ruled today that printing the motto “In God We Trust” on U.S. currency and coins is also constitutional.

    Newdow first sued the school district over the pledge in 2000. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2004 reversed a decision from the appeals court in Newdow’s favor in that case, ruling he lacked the right to sue. He sued a second time along with a student in the school system, winning in the district court after arguing his own case.

    Patriotic Exercises

    Justice Department lawyers had argued that previous Supreme Court decisions permit patriotic exercises such as the Declaration of Independence and the national anthem.

    In Newdow’s first lawsuit, the Bush administration defended the use of the phrase “one nation under God,” claiming it acknowledged the role that faith played in the founding of the country.

    Newdow didn’t immediately return voice-mail and e-mail messages seeking comment.

    The pledge was adopted by Congress in 1942 without the “under God” reference. A year later, in a case involving Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Supreme Court ruled public schools can’t require children to recite the pledge. In 1954, Congress voted to add the reference to God, citing a need to “deny the atheistic and materialistic concepts of communism.”

    The Pledge of Allegiance case is Newdow v. U.S. Congress, 06-16344, and the motto case is Newdow v. Rio Linda Union School District, 05-17257, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (San Francisco).

    To contact the reporters on this story: Joel Rosenblatt in San Francisco at [email protected]; Karen Gullo in San Francisco at [email protected].

    Last Updated: March 11, 2010 14:09 EST

  • Terry
    Terry

    Sigh...

    Most JW kids skip school nowadays anyway, don't they?

    Patriotism is not in the homeschooling venue, I hear.

  • yknot
    yknot

    The irony of 'under God' and Eisenhower.......(well at least to the JW community)

  • yknot
    yknot

    While patriotism isn't required directly, "Good Citizenship" is required for homeschoolers in you home state Terry........

  • undercover
    undercover

    I'm not a fan of the Pledge... You'll never see me do it. And I'm not crazy about it being forced on children who don't even know what's going on...it's indoctrination to worship or serve the government.

    I don't pledge my allegiance to the flag or the government or any other man-made organization. I pretty much pledge my allegiance to my family and my freedom.

    I'm not a patriot, don't pretend to be one. There are things that I'll fight for in this country, there are things I won't.

  • TheClarinetist
    TheClarinetist
    it's indoctrination to worship or serve the government.

    Amen. That's the only thing I really agree with the JWs about the pledge. You should require school-children to make a solemn vow of allegiance to a country that they are not necessarily old enough to even understand the meaning of what they are saying.

  • VoidEater
    VoidEater

    (sigh)

    Having been violently physically assaulted by a teacher for refusing, I'm pretty much off the whole thing from both an idealogic as well as personal perspective.

  • pirata
    pirata
    Most JW kids skip school nowadays anyway, don't they? Patriotism is not in the homeschooling venue, I hear.

    Most JW kids I know go to public school.

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    This article is about whether the phrase "under God" is OK. Nothing else. Right?

  • beksbks
    beksbks
    This article is about whether the phrase "under God" is OK. Nothing else. Right?

    Wellll pretty much.

    The court reversed an injunction that had prohibited recitation of the pledge at the district’s schools.

    I agree with the latest ruling. As long as people can opt out if they want to, and as long as it's "under god", not under jehovah or vishnu or buddha. Although, I do see how the pledging of allegiance is a bit tricky. Kids don't care, it's just part of the morning routine. UNLESS you are Void, or me. I had a kindergarten teacher very roughly grab my arm and slap my hand over my chest when I stood, but did not salute, as I was told to. I do believe my hatred of school started right there.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit