I Just spent a few days with my dad. I asked a few questions about the time when mum became a witness which i know is still, 38 years later, a painful thing for him to talk about. In the course of it, he also learned some stuff that he did not know about the pressures of the times.
As i expected, mum and dad have different versions of this time, and it is pretty hard to find the real truth in it and in some ways it does not matter anymore.
Mums version: She first was contacted in Echuca late 1960s and dad put a stop to it. Fast forward to 1971 and we are in Ballarat. Mum kept a JW book in the front window as a sign for witnesses that she was waiting for them. Some saw the book and kept returning till they found her. They were curious because there were no witnesses out the rural area we were. A bible study was started, dad objected, refused to sleep with her and then moved out. I was 10 in 1972 when that happened. I remember meeting witnesses from echuca around that time who were thrilled that mum had finally 'made it'. Mum remarried in 1976, we moved 400km away and i never saw or heard from dad until i was about 32.
Dads version: He has no knowledge of any witness involvement in Echuca. He did not know they were on the scene until Ballarat 1971/2. He encouraged her to be involved with them as mum was a bit lost, and where we were living was out of town, she did not drive and buses were few. He felt these new friends would fill a space in her life. Although dad was long ago finished with religion he still held a belief in 'god'. As time went on, the witnesses entered his life more and more, most memorable to dad is the amount of door to door work she was now doing. He remembers spending many hours over a 9 month period debating doctrine, theology and chronology with groups of elders (believe me, he is like that!) Those nine months were banging his head on a brick wall he reckons. It reached a head when as he described it, she was told to "stop sleeping with him or she would not get her place among the 144000 or what ever it was called". At that time she had also quit her job and was spending all her time door to door. This was when he gave her the ultimation, choose him or them. And of course mum chose them. Dad also maintains that mum was married by 1976 because it was not acceptable that an attractive woman with children be single in the 'church' ... too much temptation from males to commit fornication.
Now, i have till recently never beleived that witnesses 'broke up families' but have seen the methods used to do exactly that as well as to whom the WBTS apportions the blame. I am very curious to know if anybody has ever heard of the organization or individual elders, c/o's etc forbidding sex with the unbeleiving husband or wife. I can't recall ever seeing it in print, only the admonition to be in subjection and fullfill the marriage due etc etc. Perhaps it was a bluff tactic that backfired?
This was of course just pre 1975, and i am not surprised at how it turned out for them. Mum would have been taken into this religion on a wave of 1975 hype. The subliminal pressure to quit jobs, sell houses etc to pioneer must have been very strong. Mum no doubt was well and truly hooked by the time my dad saw what was happening. After it was all over and 1975 passed, i am not surprised that that is the timing for mum to remarry in the following 1976. Armageddon had not come and so she needed to find 3 kids a Father.
I told my dad some of the pressures and building up about 1975 and the witnesses saying armageddon would come in 75, his response was 'too bloody right they did!' His learning also helped him understand the pressure around his then wife and why she may well have gone full on like she did, and why she was willing to lose her husband and the father of her children.
Their are other ways 1975 effected us kids. Not me nor my little sister so much but my older brother may well be able to tell how it effected his education... but thats for him to share if he wishes...
oz