There was a statue outside the Rhodes University. A 30 year old black student then threw his pooh on the statue and that got the ball rolling to pull the statue down. The black student was protesting that the white Rhodes was a racist and that in a nutshell his presence reminds him of the torture black South Africans endured under white South Africans. This black student goes to the Rhodes University, built by Rhodes and those same white South Africans. The board of this university built also gives out burseries and grants to previously disadvantaged black South Africans and not disadvantaged black South Africans.
There has been a huge debate in the country and now the statue has been removed. Other statues at other universities have now been targeted - all because those people suppressed black south africans and it reminds them of the torture endured under white south africans.
Now Ghandi's statue has been defaced and black south africans are calling for it to be pulled down. I don't recall indian south africans torturing black south africans. The indians suffered under apartheid too....
Where does one draw the line?
Does pulling statues down change anything?
Should all buildings / roads / businesses built by whites and indians be pulled down?
What about Shaka Zulu? He tortured and killed 10's of thousands people from other tribes? Should his statue be allowed to remain standing?