i love tim kilgore!!!
the tone in your responses is so patient and fact driven
if only this person catches the drift....
his closed circuit mind reminded me of this graphic:
by Awakened at Gilead 68 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
i love tim kilgore!!!
the tone in your responses is so patient and fact driven
if only this person catches the drift....
his closed circuit mind reminded me of this graphic:
But when it comes to someone that hasn't finished school yet but is trying to help people..you ignore them and bombard them with statistics and things from the 1970s
It seems like this kid is still at school. I wonder what his parents would think of him sitting in bedroom running a YouTube channel like this instead of watching porno movies like regular JW kids!
George
I asked this.
Hi SoYaWannaKnowAboutJW!
Can you tell me why Jesus uses the same title? in Revelation 22:13 as Jehovah God uses in Revelation 1:8?
Thanks in advance :)
FiltaFacta
This was the reply.
@filtafacta Jehovah is speaking about himself in both of these instances. He spoke about himself three times in revelation. Rev. 1:8 was the first, and the other 2 times are in Revelation 21:5-8 and Revelation 22:12-15. And remember, these are all visions..so it may be kind of confusing. There's a book called Revelation Its Grand Climax at Hand! and explains Revelation and also has the scriptures you can look up? along with he book and your Bible.Its free and may be at your local kingdom hall.
This is my follow up :)
Hello SoYaWannaKnowAboutJW,
Regarding Revelation 22:13 "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End."
Jesus is the one is referred to who is coming soon (Revelation 22:20). He is the First and the Last (Revelation 1:17) and the one who repays? everyone for what they have done (Matthew 16:27).
Once again, it is clear that Jesus shares the exact same titles as Jehovah God.
Regards,
FiltaFacta
Let's see if he trys to sweep this under the carpet or actually faces the facts.
Blessings,
Stephen
Well Arius, the Unitarians, Nestorians, and those who chose Homoiousianism all offered up their ideas and then the lovely Trinitarian Bishops slit their throats..........some much for freedom of thought and worship around these guys.
The dude doesn't take long, must be beavering over his PC!
@filtafacta If that's what you? wanna believe. But I gave you my response.
Here's my response.
Hello SoWhatYouWannaKnowAboutJW,
It is clear that what you are telling me about Rev 22:13i.e. that Jesus is not being described in this verse is clearly at odds with the verses I have pointed out.
Check them again and see if that is indeed what you want to believe.
Bear in mind these verses, Jude 1:4, 2 Peter 2:1,? 1 John 2:22
Regards,
FiltaFacta
Blessings,
Stephen
Brings out the Rosary in him doesn't it.....
he uploaded a new video in which he states that from now on, HE will choose the subject that the questions will revolve around, and he will choose one "random" question from the comments as well.
So within what, 24-48 hours he has gone back on his word to answer any questions we have? thats classic.
the other thing about this dude, is he must be a kid, or just very ignorant of watchtower docterine. he doesnt even know the basics of many teachings, and then flat out says that he refuses to research it.
so here we have a person who doesnt know much about JW teachings, claiming to be able to answer all of our questions, but refuses to further his knowledge of said JW teachings.
that is insane but typical. im setting the over under for how many days it takes for him to delete his account at 7. im taking the under.
I'm betting the kid already has me blocked.
Seriously a guy who comes on youtube saying "I'll answer any questions you might have about Jehovah's Witnesses" is begging me to pwn him.
I wonder if my question will be too deep for him:
Hi, when the prodigal son returned to his father and was welcomed back, what additional restrictions were placed on him. Was he stopped from answering up for 6 months? Or was he truly forgiven?
I don't have acess to YouTube at work, but here's what I'd ask a JW who is begging for questions:
Please explain the scriptural principles involved in determining whether a fraction of whole blood is deemed (A) "minor" enough to be a "matter of conscience" for a JW to accept or not, or (B) a "major component" and is morally equivalent to accepting whole blood, an offense that is serious enough to get one expelled from the Christian congregation?
For example, what scriptural principles were involved in determining that transfusions of hemoglobin are a "matter of conscience", while transfusions of whole red cells are "unacceptable" to all JWs?