Well I'm bitter and shallow but I still try to have an open mind.
What about faith in human nature, Terry? Or faith in science? (Faith in science? NEVAAAAAAH!!!)
I think perhaps you're subscribing to a sort of orthodoxy as well. "Appeal to mysticism" I think does not fit in with the rest of the "spackle" in that the rest of them apply logical fallacies, whereas "appeal to mysticism" isn't really an argument per se. There is room in my universe for unquantifiables. Science delivers SOME of the goods... but not all of them. Science has its limits. It has yet to solve the fundamental problems of humanity - war, starvation, disease, etc. Will it? That's a matter of (gasp) faith, no? One that you no doubt hope for, as do I? And what if faith... DUN DUN DUN... (don't hit me please)... makes you a... better person? Perhaps you've never had a mystical experience. That's fine. Many have not. But does that automatically rule out the possibility that, for those who have, there may be something to said experiences that cannot be quantified? I've never seen an extraterrestrial, but I don't rule out the possibility of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.
Do you enjoy art galleries? Science fiction films? A world in which hard science and cold rationalism rule people's worldview would not, in my opinion, be a very fun place to live. Hell, in a lot of respects it'd be a lot like the Watchtower!
Did you see "The Invention of Lying"? Some very funny moments, but it made me think - and ultimately come to an ironic conclusion: Whatever Gervais' intention was (an atheistic message movie or nothing more than an interesting comedic premise), I realized something: There is really no scientific or logical reason that you and I do NOT in fact inhabit a drab, unimaginative, literalistic world presented in the film...
and yet..
somehow...
we live in a world with both ugliness and beauty, cynicism and wonder.
Why?
And aren't we ultimately better off for it?
This is what the dreaded F-word means to me.
(Slides soapbox back to Terry)