Watchtower Letter Shows Blood Doctrine Is False

by Marvin Shilmer 34 Replies latest jw friends

  • undercover
    undercover
    you guys have issues!

    You're right, we do have issues. We take issue with an organization that coerces people to refuse medical help that could save their life. People have died because they've been mislead to follow the WT doctrine on blood.

    the bottom line is the bible says that we should abstain from blood!

    The bottom line is that anyone who professes to be a Christian should follow the lead of their leader, Jesus Christ, who showed through words and actions that the sanctity of life is greater than that which represents it. According to him, there may be a time when a rule or 'law' has to be broken in order to preserve life.

    Jehovah will correct you in his time!

    Don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen...

  • carla
    carla

    marking

  • isaacaustin
    isaacaustin

    makonnen, you recite well. Too bad you don't understand what you recited.

  • compound complex
    compound complex

    "After the Judge's death, as World War II was ending and persecution against the Witnesses began declining, along with the attendant drop in news-media publicity, Hayden C. Covington told the author [of THE FOUR PRESIDENTS] that Fred Franz saw the prohibition against blood transfusions as a way to accomplish two things: to continue to publicize the religion, and to create an uproar in the community. This reaction would convince the membership they were being "persecuted" and "suffering for righteousness sake," a sure sign they were "in the truth."

    According to Jerry Bergman, author of BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS: A HISTORY AND EVALUATION OF THE RELIGIOUS, BIBLICAL, AND MEDICAL OBJECTIONS, 1994, p. 5:

    "The blood issue has brought witnesses more publicity than any other issue in the last twenty years."

    "The ban on blood transfusions was an effort to solidify the Knorr administration." [Knorr initially objected to the weird scriptural interpretation justifying the abstaining from blood; he understood the scriptures to be in reference to animal blood only. Nevertheless, he went along with the ban.]

    "Key Watchtower officers held a view of distrust toward the medical profession."

    "Some high level Watchtower official naively reasoned that, if eating blood was wrong, blood transfusions were also wrong because they are 'intravenous' feeding as opposed to extravenous feeding, or normal eating."

    While Rutherford swallowed some irrational rantings by Franz and Woodworth over the beginnings of the blood issue, he would not allow publication of FWF's "special knowledge" as "new light" in THE WATCHTOWER. The two mischief makers kept things stirred up and began convincing others, including Knorr. The author was told that now that "King Saul" [FWF] is dead, the leadership would like blood transfusions to be a matter of conscience and lay the blame for all the suffering at the feet of Franz and Woodworth.

    THE FOUR PRESIDENTS OF THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY (JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES), Edmond C. Gruss, Editor, pp. 74, 75, 231.

    "When faced with mounting opposition, Fred Franz eased the Society's position on blood regarding the following: (1) Serum injections such as diphtheria toxin antitoxin and gamma globulin blood fractions were permitted. (2) There was no need to drain blood from fish (except when "a person sees an accumulation of blood"), only land animals. (3) While a Witness could not personally use fertilizer using blood, he could use it when employed by a non-witness. This and similar situations were made matters of conscience. (4) Over the years, the Watch Tower Society had taken the position of prohibiting the use of blood fractions in the treatment of hemophiliacs. But long before officially leaving this stringent position, if one were to call the headquarters they would be told that such treatment was permissible. Years later, in the June 15, 1978 WATCHTOWER, the "oracle" decided the pressure was getting too severe, so he withdrew his position altogether, and permitted both hemophiliac preparations Factor VIII and IX. How many hemophiliacs died in the interim, further sacrifices on the altar of man-made Watch Tower dogma?"

    THE FOUR PRESIDENTS, E. C. Gruss, Ed., p. 77.

  • wasblind
    wasblind

    marking

  • snowbird
    snowbird

    "The blood issue has brought witnesses more publicity than any other issue in the last twenty years."

    And that's what it's all about - publicity.

    This is more than sad!

    Syl

  • wasblind
    wasblind

    The WTS says blood transfusions are the same thing as eating blood, this is not so.

    If I lost alot of blood, putting it in my mouth and swallowing it would not save my life.

    On page 71 in the Reasoning Book they say blood fractions should not be eaten, then

    they turn around and say in the Aug 2006 awake, that the Bible does not speak on this.

    WHERE DID THEY GET THIS BOGUS MESS FROM IF IT WAS NOT FROM THE BIBLE?

    HOW MANY LIVES WERE LOST BASED ON MANS OPINION ?

  • wasblind
    wasblind

    THE WTS BLOOD POLICY IS MOST DEFINITLEY THE EQUIVALENT TO JIM JONES DISPERSMENT OF KOOL-AID

  • sir82
    sir82
    the bible says that we should abstain from blood!

    The word "abstain" requires a verb - it is not a complete thought to "abstain" from a noun.

    For example, if a doctor told me to "abstain from airplanes", what does that mean? Do I not eat them, manufacture them, buy them, steal them, what?

    But if he told me to "abstain from flying in airplanes", then I understand.

    OK, so the Bible (at least the NWT) says "abstain from blood".

    What's the missing verb in there? And how do you know?

  • wasblind

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit