Embryos of all humans start to grow gills early in their development.
Whoa whoa whoa, is this provable?
-Sab
by sabastious 143 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Embryos of all humans start to grow gills early in their development.
Whoa whoa whoa, is this provable?
-Sab
@notverylikely...good point. I took that directly from of The Greatest Show on Earth and wonder if the distinction is native to South America.
Just looked up armadillos in the US and the sole species is called the Nine-Banded Armadillo. Perhaps they were introduced as they say they've been consistently expanding their range in the US over the last century due to a lack of natural predators. Found as far north found as far north as Illinois, Indiana...and get this Southern Ontario!
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdm5he_richard-dawkins-demonstrates-laryng_tech/
Really telling video.
-Sab
Just looked up armadillos in the US and the sole species is called the Nine-Banded Armadillo. Perhaps they were introduced as they say they've been consistently expanding their range in the US over the last century due to a lack of natural predators. Found as far north found as far north as Illinois, Indiana...and get this Southern Ontario!
They are native to a certain part of the country....for as far back as we can tell. They migrated when the Isthmus of Panama formed. However, they are expanding their range partly because of human activity. Here in Florida, for example, there were no armadillos until dozens busted out of a zoo a hundred years ago.
BTS
Yep...the gill thing is true. See under Human Gills...http://truth-saves.com/Embryo_Development.php (this whole website is pretty cool)
There's also an entire chapter on embryology Greatest Show on Earth.
And thanks for the info BTS. The migration when the Isthmus of Panama formed makes sense.
Didn't you hear the WT Leolaia? Keep that stuff in the coffin!
LOL I know. Ostrich ... head ... sand.
Ask Darwinists to explain the Cambrian explosion in the fossil records.
Haeckel's theory on embryo gils has been rejected by modern scientists.
"No cleanly defined and functional "fish", "reptile" and "mammal" stages of human embryonal development can be discerned."
:How do Jehovah's Witnesses Explain This Fossil Record?
The fossil record is not "Bible-Based(tm)" and everything the Watchtower teaches is Bible-Based. Therefore, the fossil record is wrong.
Simple!
Farkel
I find it ironically funny when a JW/creationist supports the theory of adaptation concerning species,
but then at the same time try their darnest to debunk evolution as a whole. Where is the logic ?
There are now other scientific tools beside radio carbon testing to determine the age of fossils.
Lets face it , religions are universities and colleges of fear and human ignorance that is their basic teaching knowledge.