Fed. Judge Just Issued Worldwide Permanent Injunction Against Don't Ask/Don't Tell

by Justitia Themis 62 Replies latest social current

  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202473278793&Judge_Issues_Global_Injunction_Against_Dont_Ask_Dont_Tell

    A federal judge in California has issued an injunction barring enforcement of "don't ask, don't tell," the federal law banning service by open homosexuals in the armed forces.

    U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips of Riverside, Calif., who on Sept. 9 found that the law was unconstitutional, granted the global injunction on Tuesday. She wrote that without the injunction, "there is no adequate remedy at law to prevent the continued violation of servicemembers' rights or to compensate them for violation of their rights."

    In issuing her order and final judgment in the case, Phillips chose not to stay the injunction. That means the government was suspended from proceeding with investigations and discharges under "don't ask, don't tell" as of 11:30 a.m. PDT on Tuesday, when Phillips posted her order.

    "The Court has provided Defendants sufficient opportunity to consider the terms of Plaintiff's proposed injunction and request a stay," she wrote. "They have failed to do so. For these reasons and those set forth in the Court's previous rulings on the issuance of a stay, the Court declined to delay entry of the injunction."

    She noted that the government could appeal her decision within the next 60 days. The government also could ask the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to issue a stay.

    Tracy Schmaler, a Department of Justice spokeswoman, declined to offer any immediate comment. The other side was jubilant, however.

    "We are extremely pleased with Judge Phillips' decision granting an immediate permanent injunction barring the U.S. military from carrying out its 'don't ask, don't tell' policy," said Dan Woods, a partner in the Los Angeles office of White & Case who represents the Log Cabin Republicans.

    "The order represents a complete and total victory for Log Cabin Republicans and reaffirms the constitutional rights of gays and lesbians in the military who are fighting and dying for our country."

    A worldwide injunction "was the only reasonable solution," Christian Berle, acting executive director of Log Cabin Republicans, said in a prepared statement. "These soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines sacrifice so much in defense of our nation and our Constitution. It is imperative that their constitutional freedoms be protected as well."

    The organization urged caution upon service members who are considering coming out in light of the development, noting that the Obama administration still could file an appeal.

    Phillips ruled in September that "don't ask, don't tell" violated service members' constitutional rights, specifically their Fifth Amendment's right of due process under the law and First Amendment right to free speech. The government had argued that a worldwide injunction would conflict with the rulings of judges in other districts and circuits, and that any injunction should be limited to members of Log Cabin Republicans, a gay Republican group.

    Phillips rejected both positions. She said an injunction limited to Log Cabin Republicans would contradict the focus of the lawsuit, which was to challenge the law in general, not as it pertained to a specific service member's rights. As for contrary court rulings, she wrote: "The fact that courts in other circuits have not invalidated the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Act does not prevent this Court from doing so."

    Phillips wrote that she considered whether portions of the law deemed constitutional could be severed from the unconstitutional parts but concluded that she had "found it unconstitutional to discharge servicemembers on the basis of their homosexuality. As the Act entirely pertains to the discharge of servicemembers on the basis of homosexual conduct, it is unconstitutional in its totality."

  • Ding
    Ding

    Why do we bother having electing legislators?

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Obama Administration Appeals Ruling

    "The Obama administration decided on Tuesday to appeal a judge's rulings that prevented the U.S. government from banning same-sex marriages, a move that could undermine support among President Barack Obama's traditional liberal base ahead of a key election."

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69B63U20101012

  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    It is the judiciary's job to check the legislature. Congress is free to write all the constitutionally valid laws they might like. ;)

  • Ding
    Ding

    Right, but you can always find a federal judge somewhere who will rule whichever way you want on a given issue.

    Why bother with elections?

    Just let this unelected group of philosopher-kings rule over us.

    We're about to that point now.

  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    Right, but you can always find a federal judge somewhere who will rule whichever way you want on a given issue.

    Why bother with elections?

    The Founding Father's framed it as an 'invitation to struggle." Why be upset when the "struggle" happens? ...just part of the process.

  • Ding
    Ding

    The Founders would be aghast at what the federal government has become.

    In Federalist 78, Hamilton called the judiciary the "least dangerous branch."

    They never foresaw what we have now.

  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    The Founders would be aghast at what the federal government has become.

    In Federalist 78, Hamilton called the judiciary the "least dangerous branch."

    They never foresaw what we have now.

    I can agree that they would be disappointed. But I think their disappointmet (if not outright disgust) would lie with Congress, and then the Executive, and perhaps not at all with the Judicial.

  • Ding
    Ding

    I think they would be appalled with a 3 branches and wonder how the people of the United States could ever have allowed this to happen.

  • SacrificialLoon
    SacrificialLoon
    Obama Administration Appeals Ruling
    "The Obama administration decided on Tuesday to appeal a judge's rulings that prevented the U.S. government from banning same-sex marriages, a move that could undermine support among President Barack Obama's traditional liberal base ahead of a key election."
    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69B63U20101012

    The Defense of Marriage Act is another matter. This doesn't relate to Don't Ask Don't Tell.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit