I'm working on my column nad came across this thought by Ray Franz regarding how often the WTS takes things out of context. They take a scripture from one places in the Bbiel and match it up with a couple of other scriptures from 2 or more other places and piece them together liek one huge jigsaw puzzle. And then present some kind of doctrinal picture based on their out-of-context jigsaw pieces.
That is like taking 3 sentences from various books on history and putting them together to create a new theory
Or even worse taking 3 words each from 3 different books and putting them together to make a whole 9 word sentence. It might work but it might not and even if the sentence itself makes some sense the final creation would bear no likeness to the original contexts where the words were taken.
And this is how they come to their "new light" doctrines.
Kinda makes one wonder about the people who think this is honorable scholarship.