It was the volume of snail mail enquiries that got them to put it there in the first place.
Snail mail is not as easy to ignor, or reply to.
by yalbmert99 40 Replies latest watchtower scandals
It was the volume of snail mail enquiries that got them to put it there in the first place.
Snail mail is not as easy to ignor, or reply to.
... plus you then have hard copy in your hot little hand and don't need it to be on the net.
This is frustrating because JW family members simply deny anything printed, or even saved in the hard drive, assuming it's a fabricated apostate document.
When it was a direct link from the UN, it was much more credible. There is enough evidence, but it's never enough for hardcore JWs.
I emailed them the day this thread was posted and got no answer also. Guess they have been pressured by WBTS.
Very likely....
When it was a direct link from the UN, it was much more credible. There is enough evidence, but it's never enough for hardcore JWs.
It can still be found using internet archives.
The wayback machine gives a snapshot of history so can be used to demonstrate that it was on the UN website.
http://waybackmachine.org/*/http://www.un.org/dpi/ngosection/pdfs/watchtower.pdf
The above link is your proof that it was on the UN website.
It is up to the person who claims it wasn't on the UN Website to provide the evidence to prove his position. A letter from Paul Hoeffel, on a UN letterhead, would be pretty convincing.
Thank you very much!
Problem is, your average JW doesn't know what the Wayback Machine is, and can easily dismiss it as part of Satan's worldly propaganda.
It is better than nothing, but not as good as if it was still hosted at the UN site.
If this true (WTS got the UN to remove) then I'll just have to enjoy the irony that the WTS can't shout 'a victory' from the rooftops!
Shame if it is not there - it really was a credible evidence.
Problem is, your average JW doesn't know what the Wayback Machine is, and can easily dismiss it as part of Satan's worldly propaganda.
That's why you make it their responsibility to prove that Wayback has been dishonest in putting up those snapshots.
The other problem is that you are trying to tell them stuff, when they have been taught to not listen. Play their game. They have been taught that they have the truth and that they have knowledge that can save you ............. so ................. just ask questions ............ then they have to provide the documentation .... and the explanations. All you have to do is control the conversation to keep them on your chosen topic.