We have a number of programs on our network and many of these programs discuss things I may not be in agreement with.
does that include mischaracterizing a painting done magnificently in the tradition of Judeo-Christian art as blasphemous and perverted? Does that include attributing homosexual themes to it and using it as pretext to rail against homosexuality, to speak as an ignorant bigot? Does that include speculating and attributing nefarious motives to Rutherford for putting the artwork in there?
You are the first person in history to assign gratuitous butt sex to Klinger's Crucifixion Christi, lol. Historically, any controversy over the painting was about Klinger painting Jesus totally in the nude, and still, nobody accused Klinger of being homosexual.