"JWs are dead right on the blood doctrine" (page 2)

sabastious

I actually kind of feel bad about using the term "child sacrifice." I replied and apologized for the jab and asked him if hed like to speak to me over the phone. I wonder if he'll do it?

-Sab

No, don't feel bad because it IS child sacrifice, nothing more. Anyone who can actually feel good at the smiling faces of dead children who lost their lives over a fake doctrine needs their head examined.

I've noticed a lot of these witnesses on the net are getting very cocky and arrogant these days (I thought they weren't supposed to talk to us anyway?). They had a clip on youtube with some news reporters interviewing dubs about their Armaggedon crap and I posted a comment stating I'm glad I'm no longer a JW so I don't have to fall for that fear mongering anymore. Would you believe some asshole had the nerve to PM me and call me "ignorant" while quoting a scripture from that oversized magazine they call the New World Translation. I won't repeat what I said back to the individual, but let's just say it wasn't very nice lol.

But back to this...I've read the e-mail responses and I find it funny how they can engage in insults and a hostile tone. So much for letting your words be "seasoned with salt". And there's me thinking they were the "true" christians. Oh well......

sabastious

Reality79: when Witnesses act this way it reminds me of yapping hyenas. They need to be calmed down before reason can be introduced, but they so easily explode in emotional outburst calming them down is almost impossible.

-Sab

miseryloveselders

Sab, that guy is a nut even by JW standards of nuttiness. The WT has published a few articles admonishing JW apologists to not interact with apostates online, and further the WT intimated that they don't need indepedent websites, blogs, forums set up to defend the WT. Simply put, the WT doesn't want or need Online WT Apologists. Looking at that guy's Youtube channel, I can understand why. Check this out.

I can imagine David Splane looking at this and going, "Why does our religion attract all the freaks?" Remember that one Youtube video from some months ago with all the neverending hearts? That video was classic!!! It was like the Care Bears on steroids!!

11 Website: http://www.youtube.com/user/jwtruth Occupation: Project Manager Companies: Self Employed Schools: High School and other Business Training Interests: Teaching what the Bible says, and anything to do with Jehovah's Witnesses Movies: Many movie types but only if they are morally clean and meet the standards of clean Christian conduct. Many movies defy Bible standards and are not suitable for family viewing. Music: Many music types. It must be morally clean and must meet the standards of clean Christian conduct. These days music is often immoral. Plenty of good music about! Look carefully! Books: Bible and anything published by the Watchtower Bible and Tracts Society.

lifeisgood

During my first marriage, to a JW, all three of our child births were extremely difficult. The first child I delivered at home because Mother Earth News said that home child birth was "wonderful and beautiful". Liars. My wife lost a lot of blood but the nurse/midwife who was helping me with the delivery said it was not life threatening.

My second child was delivered at a birthing center that was attached to the hospital. Nice home environment with a midwife/nurse to do the delivery. Emergency care was close by. This birth was also very difficult.

My third child was delivered in the emergency surgery area. This was a tough birth and I almost lost both the baby and the mother.

In all of these cases blood could have been used but was not a major issue so the doctors were okay with me rejecting it.

Now, in 2001 I was in Afghanistan. In December I was shot in the heat at Tora Bora. I was unconscious. They gave me blood. There was no option.

My point is this. If the medical procedure can be done without blood, I am okay with that. If it cannot be done without blood then you should use it. I don't see why this is a big issue.

thetrueone

I've noticed a lot of these witnesses on the net are getting very cocky and arrogant these days.

In reality fully indoctrinated JWS are always arrogant, thats been intensionally developed by their indoctiation process

by the WTS. As a part of their indoctrination they get fed a huge amount of mis-information regarding the medical practice of blood transfusions.

What mother Watchtower feeds them they accept it blindly without any rational self scrutiny.

One thing that gets missed many times in this debate is the no blood or abstain as the wording goes as expressed

by the ancient seers, was mostly concerning eating of blood from animals killed for food and perhaps used for other things.

This rabbinical law is still used today in Orthodox kosher butchering of animals for the purpose of eating the flesh of the animal.

The blood issue with the JWs is just another example of the human folly of men playing with the power of the gods.

sabastious

I don't see why this is a big issue.

It's a big issue because there is blood on their hands. Unfortunately they will deny, and legally avoid, their responsibility to the victims until they pass away.

-Sab

sabastious

The blood issue with the JWs is just another example of the human folly of men playing with the power of the gods.

For the record there has never been a documented, or verifiable, account of God killing a single person on this planet. "The power of the Gods", I believe, is still a mystery to us.

-Sab

thetrueone

But Sab what about the great flood, Yahweh killed most of mankind for no purposeful or knowing reason ?

Mary

Sounds like you hit a nerve with this moron which apparently zapped something in his stupor.............

"JWs are dead right on the blood doctrine"

Share this