J. Hofer... I want to argue with you, but I know that will just end in frustration.
NomadSoul, you wrote:
"Are you referring to a robot that just acts human? Or a robot that is constructed exactly like we are with an artificial brain that functions EXACTLY like ours? Would that make a difference in your statement?"
Good question... when I refer to robot, I think of something that acts human (simulates human intelligence). That is my understanding of AI. ... And yes, if a robot were constructed as an exact, biological clone of a human, that would make a difference to my statement.
You asked
"What do you think the clone is going to say if you ask him the same question?"
Since the question was asked before the clone was made, it wouldn't have been able to. To ask the question after the clone has been made defeats the point of the question.
You said
"So let's say in the future they can make a replica of the brain, all it's functions, everything. They can theorically transfer all that information to this brain. All your thoughts, ideas, and memories will still function. You would also have feelings since the artificial brain would also have the same capabilities."
I disagree. It would not be me, but rather a copy. If the replica is made while I am still alive, I imagine I will remain the original person. I will not be the copy. I (my soul) is not transferred into another copy of myself just because it consists of a copy of my thoughts.
Designs, who's Sam & Dave?
Clarity, sorry... I don't actually know what JW's teach about resurrection. Do they teach that the soul dies? Something will have to be kept in order to make sure the recreation is you. I call that thing, the soul. I believe that the soul is you, not your thoughts... for example, if you get Alzeimer's disease, even though you lose your thoughts, you are probably still you, and probably have the same soul.