Why Won't They Carbon Date This?

by Perry 246 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW
    Dagothur,
    How about these chickens?
    ..............Perry

    Obviously Chickens were much larger and..

    Looked much different thousands of years ago..

    ADGRPID:|SERVTYPE:

    This is a 5,000 year old Cave Painting of a customer..

    Picking up a Bucket of KFC DinoChicken..

    CaveMan Sanders and his Boys make it Finger Lickin Good!

    ..................... ...OUTLAW

  • Awen
    Awen

    I've read this topic with great interest and I would like to share a site I stumbled upon some time back.

    I am not pushijng my viewpoint. This site uses all the major scientific disciplines in an easy to understand format to make a point. It also contains scientific references should anyone wish to do some independent research. It explains the different types of methods used for recording the age of an item and the limitations of that method. It also gets into paleontology, geology etc. It's a rather large site and it may take many hours.

    Personally I don't think there's a single Evolutionist on this site who has the intestinal fortitude to question their own....dare I say it? Beliefs.

    Prove me wrong.

    Anyway, here's the link: http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/creation.shtml#011

  • EntirelyPossible
    EntirelyPossible

    Personally I don't think there's a single Evolutionist on this site who has the intestinal fortitude to question their own....dare I say it? Beliefs.

    Clearly you have no idea how science works. WTF is an evolutionist anyway?

    As for the website you linked, I refuse to read any site where the moron puts light text on a black background.

  • Awen
    Awen

    I see, another person has become a Jehovah's Witness again. I thought as much. I call you a JW because when faced with the possibility that you could be in error, you refuse to look at it. Say Hi to the other dubs for me.

  • poopsiecakes
    poopsiecakes

    Sorry Awen, that website lost me with this:

    Since we can prove the Bible is true,

    and this:

    At the time of the flood, it would have been easy for God to allow this canopy (or a large percentage of it) to fall as water.

  • ziddina
    ziddina

    Okay, first paragraph of the link Awen posted - HUGE mistake there!!

    "As we wrote in our “Science and the Bible” section, the Bible is not a science book, yet it is scientifically accurate. We are not aware of any scientific evidence that contradicts the Bible. ..."

    Three little problems with that...

    The bible states that LIGHT existed BEFORE the SUN and MOON...

    The bible states that the EARTH existed BEFORE the SUN and MOON...

    The bible states that the EARTH was FLAT...

    And that's just in the book of Genesis....

    Zid

  • shamus100
    shamus100

    Awen,

    You're bullshit self-righteous attitude kind of turned me off, truth be known. Thanks for the effort - I give you an "F".

  • poopsiecakes
    poopsiecakes

    GOLD!!

    "If you have flown on a plane, you probably noticed how different mountains look from the air than they do from the ground. They look more “wrinkled” than you would expect, and almost “artificial” in appearance. The canyons and rivers that flow out of them look different also—sort of like the seashore after the tide runs out and you see little “grooves” in the sand. This is especially noticeable if you are flying over a part of the world that does not have much vegetation to hide the shape of the land like Arizona, Nevada, and Utah in the United States. The next time you are in a plane and over such an area, look down and see if it makes sense that this appearance could have been caused about 4,000 years ago if everything had been covered with water for a year and then drained off in a short time. We do not claim this as proof, by the way—but this is one of many such observations that make one wonder."

  • bohm
    bohm

    From Awens site:

    Large groups of fossils are often found together. These “graveyards” contain a wide variety of animal remains.

    Many different types of fossils are found mixed in with one another. How logical is it that animals would die in heaps, leaving their remains for a long period of time until they are eventually covered up with dust and become fossils? Does this happen anywhere today? Of course not.

    On the other hand, if there was a worldwide flood, causing everything to drown, you would expect the bodies of all types of unrelated animals to eventually come to rest on the bottom of the body of water, in piles. As we mentioned before, the mobile sediments on the water’s “floor” would easily move around and start covering these piles of animals, forming mass “graveyards.”

    OFCOURSE no reference is supplied. The author is either a complete moron, or simply lying. It is impossible to open a book on paleontology and not know fossils are mainly formed after rapid burrial, for instance in tar pits and land slides. So why do they form in heaps? because they was burried together. So there you go awen. Not only are you wrong when you arrogantly suggest we avoid some argument we are scared of, the site you link to are full of such obvious errors only a person entirely ignorant of the subject could miss them, unless he was delibrately being dishonest.
  • shamus100
    shamus100

    So mountains were created by the ocean - u shaped valleys are shaped from GLACIERS from MILLIONS OF YEARS of glaciation. There is NO OTHER explanation.

    Holy freak, I have delved into the eyes of madness.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit