It has been very interesting and beneficial reading the posts and comments of everyone on the board since I joined back in June of this year. The recent efforts of Mankeli have made me consider exactly what it is I have issue with when it comes to the teachings of the WTBS and Jehovah's Witnesses. I have stated my background before: 38 years in the organization, 10 years at Bethel in responsible positions, 15 years an elder with Circuit and District responsibilities and parts on Circuit and Disctrict Assemblies, a former member of the Hospital Liason Committee and a Presiding Overseer for 5 years. I am not a novice, and at this point cannot be convinced by emotion or by denigration or by ostracism.
Having worked with the leadership of the WTBS I believe that they are sincere in their motives and beliefs. Most JWs I have served are sincere in their motives and beliefs. However, I believe that what they believe is based on interpretation by a self proclaimed Faithful and Discreet Slave with a self proclaimed Governing Body and that their beliefs raise many questions. My issues with Jehovah's Witnesses are simple and to date have not been answered:
1. What scripture(s) SPECIFICALLY supports the assertion that in 1918 YHWH chose the IBSA as his sole channel of communication?
2. What scripture(s) supports the assertion that there has always beens a Faithful and Discreet Slave and Governing Body?
3. What scripture (s) support the assertion that the selection of the 144,000 was started in the first centurey, progressed over the 2,000 years since then, accelerated after 1914, continues today and will continue until the end comes?
4. If the FDS is so important, why is the GB not interested in the NAMES of those who claim to be anointed? Why are they NOT consulted when the FDS is doing its thing? Why are men considered to be elders and servants raked over the coals but anyone claiming to be of the anointed is blindly believed without ANY verification?
5. Why do we not know the names and qualifications of the New World Translation committee?
Everything I was taught from the age of 7 until I left a year ago was governed by assumptions. I assumed that there was and FDS. I assumed that it had a GB. I assumed that the 144,000 teaching was correct. I assumed that the New World Translation Committee was qualified, knew the languages involved and made an error free translation. I assumed that that NWT was correct in every way and without dispute.
Now I know that none of these assertions can be proved. All other teachings are based on these assumptions. If these assumptions are not accurate then however sincere the WTBS may be, they are just another organized religion, full of sincere people, taking a stab at promoting their beliefs.
I challenge Mankeli or anyone else to argue these issues and convince me that my conerns are not valid.
MDK