Wt will Win case Before Supreme Court

by JT 35 Replies latest jw friends

  • LDH
    LDH

    Interestingly, the best thing that can come out of this would be the way the householders in Stratton would respond when a JW comes to their door.

    I mean, here is an elected official (JWs don't vote so this means NOTHING to them) giving the JW a chance to register because certain of his constituents don't want to be bothered--and they freakin ignore it!

    I would give anything to be a fly on the wall of the KH that serves
    Stratton territory.

    And YES people want their First Amendment rights protected, but do those same people like being interrupted every night during dinner by telemarketers? Hell NO!

    I would say the creators of the 1st amendment never forsaw automatic dialers, the emergence of 4 bajillion Non-profits doing professional begging, or a pesky little religiuos group known as JW.

    Their right to free speech isn't more important than my right to privacy.

    I hope they do win so people will see just how persistent they are in getting their demands.

    Also, I bet the neighborhoods that the SC justices live in stop them at the guarded gate. NICE.

    Lisa
    Would love them to come to my door Class

  • no1special
    no1special

    here's another take on the case (posted by patio34 earlier). It's hillarious -- WT still wins, but it was more by default than any brilliance by their lawyer.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=22485&site=3

  • anewperson
    anewperson

    WTS will again nothing they supposedly didn't already have so big deal. Why not email/mail Strattonians info on the WTS to give the JWs who come knocking: the secret UN liason, pedophile coverups, bleeding deaths etc. Send copies to churches in or near Stratton.

  • voltaire
    voltaire

    I agree that the WT should win the case. Three cheers for deomacracy! It allows dissent and freedom of speech. The society vilifies and demonizes the gov'ts, but the GB can't hold a candle to the U.S. in the arena of human rights.

  • mrs rocky2
    mrs rocky2

    It is my belief that the real question not about freedom of speech. The Witnesses have won the right to preach on public streets, but does the Constitution guarantee the right to preach on private property? Where does public property end and private property begin? The Dubs are not paying to maintain my driveway, walkway, doorstep (property that I pay taxes on). Doesn't the property owner have some rights to determine who has access to their private property? After all, if the dubs fall on my side of the fence I am the one liable for their injury.

    Mrs R

  • Seeker
    Seeker
    If a neo-nazi group wishes to spread their message, are they not permitted to do so by this amendment? Are there other provisions preventing this?

    Absolutely! They are welcome to spread their message in this country, and opponents are just as welcome to spread a counter message. There have been some well-known neo-nazi marches in this country. As long as they do it peacefully, they are welcome to do so under the Constitution.

    That's the way free speech works.

  • Seeker
    Seeker
    Doesn't the property owner have some rights to determine who has access to their private property?

    Sure. Just put a sign saying "No JWs" on the outer edge of your property, and if they disobey, take 'em to court.

  • sf
    sf

    "I am NOT in favor of giving legal support to pedophiles going door to door.

    I am not a proponent for government inteerference. But I DO want these pedophiles kept off my front door. If Jehovah's Witnesses want equal rights, then let them have equal decency first. NO OTHER RELIGION ORDERS CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTERS TO PEOPLE'S DOORS!!!

    If there's one good thing about this case, it is: It is now a matter of public court record that Jehovah's Witnesses order their members,who are known pedophiles, to go door to door."

    Any MALE jws who even try to approach my property will be greeted with a thunderous reaction from me verbally, making sure my neighbors here me well. The jw women will be allowed to go up the stairs and approach the door, where I'll be waiting anxiously. Now, if the MALES should happen to get past my surveillence and do get to the porch...well, they will wished they hadn't ignored my request from the last time three jw MALES got out of their car right in front of my house... "NO MALE jws to call upon my home".

    How is each householder to be aware of who is a "good witness" and who is the "protected predator" knocking on your doorholding a bible? How? EDUCATING EACH AND EVERY AMERICAN COMMUNITY IS EXACTLY HOW!

    Printing up fliers, taking out ads and by writing to editorial/opinion pages in each of our communities news media outlets, that contain, among other vital info and alerts (press releases) posted on them, ALL MAJOR DOCUMENTS, B.O.E. LETTERS, SITES AND NEWS ARTICLES re: blood, pedophilia and all UNITED NATIONS DOCUMENTS...plus an extensive list of sites to research, is a good start.

    Do they have balls? bwahhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    That's what they think they have.

    Listen up Ted and Ciro:

    I will not lay down.
    I will not go quitely.
    I will spread the "good news" to all the nations of just howevil and corrupt your precious book publishing empire TRULY IS.
    I have a pretty kickass attorney myself and my mother's husband isn't to comfortable with this knowledge. Will you help him go up against me and my attorney? Or will you kiss his devotional ass goodbye?

    I am so ready to take your balls in my hands and make mincemeat with them then force that fine spiritual food down your scrawny throats.

    sKally...remember boys of the "evil axis":

    If man was supposedly created in gods image, then.....holy krap...we're all doomed.-sKallyWagger

  • Pathofthorns
    Pathofthorns

    ... if only more knew about the "do not call" list...

    Path

  • expatbrit
    expatbrit

    Seeker:

    Thanks. Next question: if a neo-nazi group goes from door to door spreading a message advocating and calling for the death of Jews, are they still covered under the first amendment?

    Expatbrit

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit