Hi everyone
Normally I don't go in for these conspiracy theory ideas, but a comment by kurtbethel on another thread got me to thinking. Might this latest DVD actually be proof that there are operatives inside Watchtower HQ who are deliberately sabotaging the Society's material? Or are the Society really THAT stupid that they would score such a dramatic own goal, i.e. with Sparlock?
In my opion, it's difficult to arrive at a more satisfactory explanation as to how they could have "dropped the ball" so spectacularly with this DVD. I've watched both videos a few times now, and each time I am more and more impressed by how fake and stereotyped the characters are, and how over-dramatized and exaggerated everything is. It's almost as though the videos were intended as a spoof or comedy. Maybe they were, and whoever orchestrated the whole thing knows full well that the GB members have such a humor-vacuum that they would completely miss all the subtle innuendos when presented with the films for final approval.
On the other hand, if it WAS deliberate, and someone intended the DVD to be so blatantly awful, do the pros really outweigh the cons? Yes, we as adults can mostly see the funny side (once we have gotten past the disturbing flashbacks of suppressed childhoods for those of us who were born-ins). However, regardless of how awful and unbelievable the DVD is, many kids will still take it seriously. Hell, some adults will take it seriously too. This is the only major flaw I can think of in the conspiracy theory. If it was intentional, then the amount of potential damage caused by the DVD would (and will) far outweigh the gains made in exposing the organization to the world as a crazy cult.
Also, I keep thinking of how embarrassingly short the whole production is. Even padded out by the hypnotic singing "obey us" montage and the message from Anthony Morris III (which could have been put together in one bethel afternoon) the video is embarrassingly short - really too short to justify the DVD burning, packaging and distribution costs. Could it be possible that they were forced to pull production half way through, and just roll out whatever they had, no matter how short and "unfinished"?
Put it this way, I can't imagine them deliberately setting out to produce such a short DVD with only two tiny stories. I couldn't imagine pitching the idea at a bethel meeting, and I couldn't imagine accepting the idea if it were pitched to me. That only leaves (in my mind) the possibility that it wasn't intended to be this way. We are looking at an unfinished product, that's how I see it.
Somehow, it all doesn't add up. There are way too many questions. I would love to know the full story.
Cedars