Evolution skeptics will soon be silenced by science: Richard Leakey

by cantleave 30 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    Can you see the JW's changing their stance?

    http://richarddawkins.net/articles/646060-evolution-skeptics-will-soon-be-silenced-by-science-richard-leakey

    Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history.

    Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

    Sometime in the next 15 to 30 years, scientific discoveries will have accelerated to the point that "even the skeptics can accept it," the Kenyan-born paleoanthropologist said.

    "If you get to the stage where you can persuade people on the evidence, that it's solid, that we are all African, that colour is superficial, that stages of development of culture are all interactive, then I think we have a chance of a world that will respond better to global challenges."

    Leakey, a professor at Stony Brook University on Long Island, recently spent several weeks in New York promoting the Turkana Basin Institute in Kenya. The institute, where Leakey spends most of his time, welcomes researchers and scientists from around the world dedicated to unearthing the origins of humanity in an area rich with fossils.

    His friend Paul Simon performed at a May 2 fundraiser for the institute in Manhattan that collected more than $2 million US. A National Geographic documentary on his work at Turkana aired this month on public television.

    Now 67, Leakey is the son of the late renowned archeologists Louis and Mary Leakey and conducts research with his wife, Meave, and daughter, Louise. The family claims to have unearthed "much of the existing fossil evidence for human evolution."

    On the eve of his return to Africa earlier this week, Leakey spoke to The Associated Press in New York City about the past and the future.

    Extinction driven by environmental change

    "If you look back, the thing that strikes you, if you've got any sensitivity, is that extinction is the most common phenomena," Leakey says. "Extinction is always driven by environmental change. Environmental change is always driven by climate change. Man accelerated, if not created, planet change phenomena; I think we have to recognize that the future is by no means a very rosy one."

    Any hope for humanity's future, he insists, rests on accepting existing scientific evidence of its past.

    'If you don't like the word "evolution," I don't care what you call it, but life has changed.'

    — Richard Leakey

    "If we're spreading out across the world from centres like Europe and America that evolution is nonsense and science is nonsense, how do you combat new pathogens, how do you combat new strains of disease that are evolving in the environment?" he asked.

    "If you don't like the word 'evolution,' I don't care what you call it, but life has changed. You can lay out all the fossils that have been collected and establish lineages that even a fool could work up. So, the question is why, how does this happen? It's not covered by Genesis. There's no explanation for this change going back 500 million years in any book I've read from the lips of any God."

    Leakey insists he has no animosity toward religion.

    "If you tell me, well, people really need a faith ... I understand that," he said.

    "I see no reason why you shouldn't go through your life thinking if you're a good citizen, you'll get a better future in the afterlife."

    Lost legs in plane accident

    Leakey began his work searching for fossils in the mid-1960s. His team unearthed a nearly complete 1.6-million-year-old skeleton in 1984 that became known as "Turkana Boy," the first known early human with long legs, short arms and a tall stature.

    In the late 1980s, Leakey began a career in government service in Kenya, heading the Kenya Wildlife Service. He led the quest to protect elephants from poachers who were killing the animals at an alarming rate in order to harvest their valuable ivory tusks. He gathered 12 tonnes of confiscated ivory in Nairobi National Park and set it afire in a 1989 demonstration that attracted worldwide headlines.

    In 1993, Leakey crashed a small propeller-driven plane; his lower legs were later amputated and he now gets around on artificial limbs. There were suspicions the plane had been sabotaged by his political enemies, but it was never proven.

    About a decade ago, he visited Stony Brook University on eastern Long Island, a part of the State University of New York, as a guest lecturer. Then president Shirley Strum Kenny began lobbying Leakey to join the faculty. It was a process that took about two years; he relented after returning to the campus to accept an honorary degree.

    Kenny convinced him that he could remain in Kenya most of the time, where Stony Brook anthropology students could visit and learn about his work. And the college founded in 1957 would benefit from the gravitas of such a noted professor on its faculty.

    "It was much easier to work with a new university that didn't have a 200-year-old image where it was so set in its ways like some of the Ivy League schools that you couldn't really change what they did and what they thought," he said.

    Human survival in doubt

    Earlier this month, Paul Simon performed at a benefit dinner for the Turkana Basin Institute. IMAX CEO Rich Gelfond and his wife, Peggy Bonapace Gelfond, and billionaire hedge fund investor Jim Simons and his wife, Marilyn, were among those attending the exclusive show in Manhattan's Chelsea neighbourhood.

    Simon agreed to allow his music to be performed on the National Geographic documentary airing on PBS and donated an autographed guitar at the fundraiser that sold for nearly $20,000.

    Leakey, who clearly cherishes investigating the past, is less optimistic about the future.

    "We may be on the cusp of some very real disasters that have nothing to do with whether the elephant survives, or a cheetah survives, but if we survive," he warned.

  • Caedes
    Caedes

    There is already overwhelming empirical evidence that evolution is true. No amount of scientific evidence is going to convince certain sections of society that their mythology is wrong, it is too difficult for some to admit that they were wrong.

    It is unbeleivably naive to think any further evidence is going to convince these people.

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    As long as there is deconstruction silences will never go undisturbed.

    Talk of science "silencing" its critics oddly plays into the very discourses that tend to undermine its truth claims.

  • besty
    besty

    all scientists are skeptics by definition - they need a well supported evidential basis for their position

    i think a more appropriate term in this instance would be 'deniers':

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialism

    "...choosing to deny reality as a way to avoid an uncomfortable truth..."

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    What is reality but a social construct?

  • breakfast of champions
    breakfast of champions

    I thought this was a pretty naïve statement by Leakey. I'd like to think he was right, but he's probably not. People are nuts.

  • Flat_Accent
    Flat_Accent

    People will still believe what they want. Their credibility will just take a nose-dive.

  • NewChapter
    NewChapter

    WOW---he must understand that the more evidence presented, the deeper the cognitive dissonance, and the more the deniers will dig in their heels. And remember, a lot of them are homeschooling, and sending their children to religious schools---why there's a good chance they will be able to deny facts for another century--

    Happily, it seems to be mostly an American phenomena, and while I'm American, I do hope the rest of the world can put on some pressure to take climate change seriously.

    NC

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    What's this got to do with climate change? I thought global warming hysteria was in retreat among scientists anyway?

  • NewChapter
    NewChapter

    SBF:

    People that deny evolution don't trust science, and believe that having been created, God is watching out for the planet and they need not fear what humans do to it. They cannot accept that we, like other species, are capable of going extinct. They don't accept that it is through natural selection that we are successful species, and if we destroy our environment, we will no longer be selected. Because they feel that we have divine protection as a creation, rather than a species that can fall victim to massive enviromental change.

    If you can deny science on one level, you can deny it on all.

    Scientists backing away from the claim? I don't think so. However there has been a manipulation by conservatives to make it seem that way. For instance, in Virginia they passed a law that when talking about environmental issues, terms like climate change, global warming, and rising sea levels are not to be used in government writings---they need to be replaced with words like ---flooding---you can look up specifics on it. Nobody is backing off----but people are manipulating language.

    NC

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit