On the one hand, I believe in some instances the radicalization of our movement can do more harm than good. On the other hand, the very existence of a secret list of pedophiles is "radical" in itself, not to mention highly unethical and unquestionably wrong. Furthermore, any intervention from Anonymous would be an intervention from an outside organization, and not apostates per se (even though they are on our side, and acting on our pleas for help), so the cries of persecution need not be levelled at "wicked apostates" entirely. I agree with OUTLAW that confidentiality is something for the Society to worry about, and not us. They shouldn't have the list in the first place. However, I would still urge caution in the manner in which the list is published, just to avoid any unneccesay legal entanglements for valuable websites such as freeminds and silentlambs. I simply don't want to see the likes of Randy in court for the sake of not conveying the information in quite the right way, that's all. I'm sure he's smart enough, and knows what he's doing.
One thing's for sure - IF Anonymous pulls this off it will be an unbridled catastrophe for the Watchtower, and will accelerate the decline of the organization. I can only give support to anything that has that kind of outcome, regardless of how 'controversial' the methods may be.
Cedars