I picked out these quotes from Hawk's UN thread.
I cannot believe the Watchtower Printing Corporation had the balls to print this total pile of shit:
" You are assuming that the association of the Watchtower with the UN was a gross sin and not an innocent act in order to take advantage of a resource for upcoming articles."
Of course, this is a total red herring, and a big, fat lie. We already know that the WTS did not need to become and NGO in order to have access to all materials in the various UN libraries.
"By your statements in this post you doubt the sincerity of the Watchtower's explanation on the reason they became an NGO.
Why should we doubt our brothers?"
The message here is simple: "if they are our 'brothers' no-matter-what they do, why should we doubt them?" If they advocated genocide, "why should we doubt them. They are our 'brothers'." What validity is given to an act that is totally contrary what the 'brothers' have been saying for decades, when it's sole justification is that it was done by 'out brothers?'
I think I'm going to puke. This is the most idiotic statement I believe I've ever heard. But WAIT! There's more!
"Is becoming an NGO the same as fornicating with the enemy? I don't think so."
It doesn't matter what YOU think, DipShit. The WTS swore to support and uphold and promote the standards of the UN and they did it 10 times in a row, year-after-year. At the same time, they said false religion was "fornicating" with the UN when they did the very same thing.
"The brothers obviously saw a benefit without compromising our loyalty to Jehovah."
Oh? And where's the evidence for that, dummy? Just because YOU said so?
"They took advantage of what the UN was offering, but they did not back it up as humanity's solution to its problems."
Another red herring. No one has accused the WTS of "backing it up as humanity's solution to its problems." Does everyone see the idiocy of that statement? That's like being involved in the Mafia and when caught saying, "well we never backed up the Mafia as humanity's solution to its problems."
"They never said that it is Jehovah's instrument to bring peace and security to earth."
Another red herring. See my comment just above.
"I do not see the actions of these brothers as a "sin".
No one gives a rat what you "see." The fact (once again) is that for years your religion has claimed that all other religions are a harlot that fornicates with the United Nations. When caught red handed with 10 years of signed documents where your leaders swore to uphold and promote the interests of the very organization you have vilified as Satan's instrument, you now say, "I don't see that as a sin." You are a sack of shit hypocrite and shameless liar, dude.
"I am sorry to point out that maybe on this issue, you have read too much into the "apostate reasoning" that is presented with the supposed "proof".
Sorry? Why? Because you were caught? And if the so-called "apostate reasoning" is "supposed proof," did your leaders immediately withdraw from that association when the "apostates" discovered your charade? Also, if the proof is only "supposed," then where's a solid rebuttal to that proof without the ad hominems and red herrings?
"If one looks at this "proof" without the demonized reasoning, then there is nothing to it."
Ad hominem. The reasoning is "demonized" but no evidence is offered. If it really was "demonized," then surely a religion solely directed by Jehovah himself should have no trouble convincing any reasonable person that you are innocent. But you didn't do that. Why didn't you do that?
I'll tell you why: you are goddamned LIAR working for a band of goddamned LIARS, that's why. Refute THAT.
FarkelI cannot believe the Watchtower Printing Corporation had the balls to print this total pile of shit:
" You are assuming that the association of the Watchtower with the UN was a gross sin and not an innocent act in order to take advantage of a resource for upcoming articles."
Of course, this is a total red herring.
"By your statements in this post you doubt the sincerity of the Watchtower's explanation on the reason they became an NGO.
Why should we doubt our brothers?"
The message here is simple: "if they are our 'brothers' no-matter-what they do, why should we doubt them?" If they advocated genocide, "why should we doubt them. They are our 'brothers'." What validity is given to an act that is totally contrary what the 'brothers' have been saying for decades, when it's sole justification is that it was done by 'out brothers?'
I think I'm going to puke. This is the most idiotic statement I believe I've ever heard. But WAIT! There's more!
"Is becoming an NGO the same as fornicating with the enemy? I don't think so."
It doesn't matter what YOU think, DipShit. The WTS swore to support and uphold and promote the standards of the UN and they did it 10 times in a row, year-after-year. At the same time, they said false religion was "fornicating" with the UN when they did the very same thing.
"The brothers obviously saw a benefit without compromising our loyalty to Jehovah."
Oh? And where's the evidence for that, dummy? Just because YOU said so?
"They took advantage of what the UN was offering, but they did not back it up as humanity's solution to its problems."
Another red herring. No one has accused the WTS of "backing it up as humanity's solution to its problems." Does everyone see the idiocy of that statement? That's like being involved in the Mafia and when caught saying, "well we never backed up the Mafia as humanity's solution to its problems."
"They never said that it is Jehovah's instrument to bring peace and security to earth."
Another red herring. See my comment just above.
"I do not see the actions of these brothers as a "sin".
No one gives a rat what you "see." The fact (once again) is that for years your religion has claimed that all other religions are a harlot that fornicates with the United Nations. When caught red handed with 10 years of signed documents where your leaders swore to uphold and promote the interests of the very organization you have vilified as Satan's instrument, you now say, "I don't see that as a sin." You are a sack of shit hypocrite and shameless liar, dude.
"I am sorry to point out that maybe on this issue, you have read too much into the "apostate reasoning" that is presented with the supposed "proof".
Sorry? Why? Because you were caught? And if the so-called "apostate reasoning" is "supposed proof," did your leaders immediately withdraw from that association when the "apostates" discovered your charade? Also, if the proof is only "supposed," then where's a solid rebuttal to that proof without the ad hominems and red herrings?
"If one looks at this "proof" without the demonized reasoning, then there is nothing to it."
Ad hominem. The reasoning is "demonized" but no evidence is offered. If it really was "demonized," then surely a religion solely directed by Jehovah himself should have no trouble convincing any reasonable person that you are innocent. But you didn't do that. Why didn't you do that?
I'll tell you why: you are goddamned LIAR working for a band of goddamned LIARS, that's why. Refute THAT.
Farkel