Gozz: Who said that giving is wrong? Why does the Jws not use Paul as an example. He still worked as a tent maker so as not to place a burden on the brothers. Why not follow that example in the circuit work?
****On what reading do you base your comment. The gracious Apostle Paul did work as a tent maker, but that should not be misconstrued that he did at the expense, or suffering of the spreading of the good news. He certainly was not a burden on the brothers, and neither are those in the circuit work. Or do you complain? Do you not rrejoice in gracefully sharing with the holy ones int he good work they do? If you share, then, you must share with heartfelt appreciation, and with thanks. In the spirit of balance, the Apostle Paul, inspiringly encouraged unselfish sharing. Are you of the opinion that the brothers in the circuit are burden? I fear that you would have fallen to apostate propaganda, and the wicked reasoning of those not showing appreciation for spiritual things.
That way, a lot more money could go to what James calls the “acceptable form” of worship, namely, looking after widows and orphans. When the apostles took up collections, it was for the poor, not for the fat cats who, because of their insulated world, have no idea what it is to make a living.****Take a moment to think about it! What if the Society were to hire people to do all the work that is accomplished, the printing of materials for the publishing of the good news, and sundry other tasks that lead to the smooth running of the organozation. At what cost will all that be? Surely, the work to be accomplished is enormous, and needs a great deal of organizational coordination and funds, which the scriptures clearly christen 'unrighteous riches'. Of course, the congregations are there to take good care of the poor, and share with them according to their needs. Is there a dearth of this wonderful sharing spirit in your congregation? You clearly show that your idea of making a living is inseparably linked with making money. There is money, and ther is life. And the work being engaged in by our brothers, though being obliquely despised by you, is the best work possible, and the best offering for a living that can be made. Do you not rejoice at that? It is Jehovah who makes rich, and adds no pain along with it. If the brothers look fat and well-fed, this should be a matter for rejoicing, even by you, for they have forsaken the pursuance of worldy riches, and have dedicated themselves, fully, wholesouled, to working what is fine. How is it possible that you make an argument against such a willingness to give, not things perishable, but the life, everlasting, in a city with no eartly foundations?