Give me fifteen minutes' research time and I can absolutely trounce the author! His argument is seriously flawed. It is late.
Is there some way to post my findings on-line so readers of his argument will see my argument, too?
First, when you rebut someone, your writing needs to be clear and concise. Admittedly, I do not do it here. If I published an actual piece, it would have clarity. It may be his writing style but his main point, that the UN did not provide the requirements for NGO status at the time the Witnesses were granted NGO status, gets lost. I fail to see where he clearly reports what the requirements were for NGO status at the time NGO status was granted.
Also, I recall the formation of the UN and the Witness' view of the UN. Ha!