Isidore, it's not important to me that Rome stay part of the Orthodox Church or that the Anglican church stays part of the Orthodox Church. What is important is that the RC claims they are the trunk of the tree, when really they are the first branch. I mean, it's not seriously important, it's just something I didn't know until one of my Anglican priest friends told me and I looked into it.
This is a fairly reply by Anglican who try to rationalize that they are still part of the Apostolic succession. Of course a non-Catholic is going to amke this assertion. To do otherwise would give them a real intellectual dilemma.
The Roman church eventually set up their bishop as Pope of their church. It's true that you do learn something new everyday.
Did you bother to read the numerous accounts of Eastern (Orthodox) bishops that I cited above? Obviously not, because they debunk your revisionism history.
The Episcopal Church has an open communion policy. The RC does not. So, unless I have a reason to attend the RC masses, I don't usually attend them. The Orthodox Church would be too much for me. They mix their wine with the bread and they serve it to everyone off the same spoon. They also have a closed communion.
By receiving Communion, you are publically professing that you believe and and adhere to ALL of the teachigs of the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Since you obviously don't, thank goodness you have not been given Holy Communion in the Catholic Church.
1 Corinthians 11
For as often as you shall eat this bread, and drink the chalice, you shall shew the death of the Lord, until he come. [27] Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord. [28] But let a man prove himself: and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of the chalice. [29] For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord.