I doubt the Queen ever wanks. That lecherous rabbit Philip's arse is always in the way.
OK, this is the last time I will comment on this subject , but EVERYBODY does it.
by smiddy 29 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
-
steve2
I doubt the Queen ever wanks.
I think you are correct - but not for the reason you give. A woman of her rank and means would have some obliging servant do it for her. This ensures her hands remain unstained - an occupational necessity for public appearances.
-
ziddina
Hey Smiddy!!
Thanks for confirming that the idiotic video is still up and running on their website. If THAT doesn't drive at least a few JWs out of the Borg, I don't know what will...
-
King Solomon
Smiddy said:
How come nobody has commented on the Queen ?
" " " " " : Pope ?
" " " " " Presidents ?
" " " " " prime Ministers ?
Smiddy, you DO realize that the porn website you're paying $$$ for doesn't actually feature the actual celebrities/politicians, but uses body-doubles and celebrity look-alikes? For example, look closely and you'll see that the name "Queen Elizabeth" is actually spelled, "Queen Elizabitch".... BIG difference!!!
-
cobaltcupcake
If the good Lord didn't want us to masturbate he would have placed those organs where we can't get at them, like that spot in the middle of your back that you can't quite reach.
http://scottleblog.wordpress.com
The Odd Life of Jehovah's Witnesses
-
TD
I've sometimes wondered what would be the difference in JW land between male masturbation and male nocturnal emission. (Colloquially called a 'Wet Dream')
Think about it. The male sexual apparatus produces a fluid and that fluid is stored. As with all bodily storage systems, capacity is finite. Eventually something has to give. You would think that would be a no-brainer.
If a person does not have the common sense to get up and urinate when they need to, the autonomic nervous system will eventually take over and they'll urinate whether they want to or not.
If a single man does not have the common sense to take care of himself now and then, the autonomic nervous system will eventually take over and he'll experience release whether he wants to or not.
What's the difference? Dreams are okay, but waking thoughts are not? Are JW's so naive as to believe that a person can dream something that's not already there?
-
King Solomon
Cobaltcake said:
If the good Lord didn't want us to masturbate he would have placed those organs where we can't get at them, like that spot in the middle of your back that you can't quite reach.
LOL! Clearly written by someone who's never had to clean up a bathroom after a young male decided to urinate "hands-free".
TD said:
If a single man does not have the common sense to take care of himself now and then, the autonomic nervous system will eventually take over and he'll experience release whether he wants to or not.
What's the difference? Dreams are okay, but waking thoughts are not? Are JW's so naive as to believe that a person can dream something that's not already there?
This is going to come as a shock to you (are you sitting down?), but major religions don't rely on the obvious and well-known principles of modern science! I know!! Whoda thunk?
The ancient belief that existed at the time the Bible was written was that ejaculation physically WEAKENS the male, as the ejaculate was considered to contain vital life-force (ruah) fluids, and hence losing some of the fluid drains him of his strength, vigor, vitality (we experience this today as the sleepiness which results after sex). This is a well-known fact to anyone who's studied ancient writings (non-Biblical) that survive which document how ancient men viewed their bodies.
As if we need MORE examples, this is YET another reason NOT to base public and religious policy on views of the World that existed 2,500 yr ago, simply because the Bible tells us so.
-
jam
Don,t know if this true or not but according to the
home office in NY, to prevent those nasty dreams, sleep
on your back. When I heard that I LMAO.
-
TD
This is going to come as a shock to you (are you sitting down?), but major religions don't rely on the obvious and well-known principles of modern science! I know!! Whoda thunk?
No argument on that. My question was based more on what I've read in JW publications, which seems to be mostly inductive morality based on NT texts.
(e.g. That it's not deadening, ".....YOUR body members that are upon the earth as respects fornication, uncleanness, sexual appetite, hurtful desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry")
-
loading
HAHAHA "It's getting out of hand"