Okay, this might sound like a really stupid question, but after researching this matter for the last hour, I still have no idea why the Watchtower Society points to 1914 and 1919 using the 70 weeks theory.
Don't get me wrong, I know all about 607 B.C.E., but I am having trouble understanding why the prophecy of the 70 weeks has been added. Whose idea was it to add the 70 week business into the mix?
I've researched the following websites and JWN threads so far, yet I'm still hitting blanks:
- http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/209971/1/607-wrong-using-ONLY-the-bible-and-some-common-sense
- http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/118445/1/607-website-part-1
- http://www.jehovahsjudgment.co.uk/607/realissue.html
- http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/607-1914.php
- http://jeffro77.wordpress.com/607-for-dummies/
- http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/74549/1/587-BC-for-Total-Dunderheads
- http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/224385/1/Explain-in-a-FEW-words-why-the-607-date-is-incorrect
- http://www.607v587.com/
- http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2011736?q=jerusalem%27s+destruction&p=par
- http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2011810?q=jerusalem%27s+destruction&p=par
Just so that we're clear, I don't need to know why 607 B.C.E. is the wrong date. I've got that down to a tee. All I need to know is where the Organisation got the 70 week prophecy from and what made them think that it would be okay to use that to prove 607 B.C.E.
Of course, like most things the Society does, there might not be a real reason, after all, 1914 was originally calculated from measuring the pyramids. What a novel idea...
Can't wait to hear your answers. I am building a glossary on JWB - http://www.jehovahswitnessblog.com/jehovahs-witness-glossary/ and it's my aim to make this as simple as possible for anyone trying to understand 607, 1914, and 1919.
Warm regards,
Jaymes
PS. The best and simplest replies will get a small packet of raisins sent in the post...